scispace - formally typeset
B

Bruno H. Repp

Researcher at Haskins Laboratories

Publications -  234
Citations -  13953

Bruno H. Repp is an academic researcher from Haskins Laboratories. The author has contributed to research in topics: Finger tapping & Speech perception. The author has an hindex of 60, co-authored 234 publications receiving 13063 citations. Previous affiliations of Bruno H. Repp include Radboud University Nijmegen & Rutgers University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Against a role of "chirp" identification in duplex perception.

TL;DR: A lot more is to be learned about dichotic fusion and auditory segregation in speech stimuli, and what kinds of neural mechanisms it involves, and whether or not it is specific to phonetic perception are to be pursued.
Journal ArticleDOI

Parameters of spectral/temporal fusion in speech perception

TL;DR: It is found that the mere onset of an isolated, contralateral third-formant (F3) transition can be sufficient to cue the /da/-/ga/ distinction, and subjects’ tolerance of temporal asynchrony was about the same in dichotic and diotic conditions, suggesting that the temporal integration mechanism that combines phonetic information from the isolated F3 segment and the base operates similarly in both conditions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cognition and the Symbolic Processes: Applied and Ecological Perspectives:

TL;DR: This volume is largely the outcome of a conference held in honor of James J. Jenkins at the University of South Florida, Tampa, in January of 1987, with the original title of Speaking, Reading as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Dichotic forward and backward "masking" between CV syllables.

TL;DR: A model is suggested to account for the pattern of errors in dichotic listening: confusions are assumed to arise from nonspecific capacity limitations (�’perceptual noise’’), separately for each stimulus (hemisphere), and, at short SOAs, responses are assuming to be frequently assigned to the wrong channel.
Journal ArticleDOI

Single formant contrast in vowel identification

TL;DR: The results suggest a sensory, rather than a judgmental, basis for the vowel contrast effects obtained, and suggest that contrast was as powerful from single formants as from the full vowels.