C
C. Daniel Batson
Researcher at University of Kansas
Publications - 124
Citations - 28050
C. Daniel Batson is an academic researcher from University of Kansas. The author has contributed to research in topics: Empathy & Prosocial behavior. The author has an hindex of 69, co-authored 123 publications receiving 26016 citations. Previous affiliations of C. Daniel Batson include University of Wisconsin–Oshkosh.
Papers
More filters
Book
The Altruism Question: Toward A Social-psychological Answer
TL;DR: A Three Path Model of Egoistic and Altruistic Motivation to Help: The Empathy-Altruism Hypothesis as discussed by the authors, a Scientific Method for Addressing the Altruism Question.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Neural Substrate of Human Empathy: Effects of Perspective-taking and Cognitive Appraisal
TL;DR: The view that humans' responses to the pain of others can be modulated by cognitive and motivational processes, which influence whether observing a conspecific in need of help will result in empathic concern, an important instigator for helping behavior, is supported.
Journal ArticleDOI
"From Jerusalem to Jericho": A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior.
John M. Darley,C. Daniel Batson +1 more
TL;DR: The authors examined the influence of several situational and personality variables on helping behavior in an emergency situation suggested by the parable of the Good Samaritan and found that if a subject did stop to offer help, the character of the helping response was related to his type of religiosity.
Reference EntryDOI
Altruism and Prosocial Behavior
TL;DR: Prosocial behavior is defined as "a broad range of actions intended to benefit one or more people other than oneself, such as helping, comforting, sharing, and cooperation".
Journal ArticleDOI
Perspective Taking: Imagining How Another Feels Versus Imaging How You Would Feel
TL;DR: This paper found that imagining how the other feels produced empathy, but it also produced personal distress, which has been found to evoke egoistic motivation, and that the two imagine perspectives produced the predicted distinct pattern of emotions, suggesting different motivational consequences.