Toxic metal pollution of waters and soils is a major environmental problem, and most conventional remediation approaches do not provide acceptable solutions. The use of specially selected and engineered metal-accumulating plants for environmental clean-up is an emerging technology called phytoremediation. Three subsets of this technology are applicable to toxic metal remediation: (1) Phytoextraction--the use of metal-accumulating plants to remove toxic metals from soil; (2) Rhizofiltration--the use of plant roots to remove toxic metals from polluted waters; and (3) Phytostabilization--the use of plants to eliminate the bioavailability of toxic metals in soils. Biological mechanisms of toxic metal uptake, translocation and resistance as well as strategies for improving phytoremediation are also discussed.

Phytoremediation: A Novel Strategy for the Removal of Toxic Metals from the Environment Using Plants

plants capable of accumulating uncommonly high Zn levels. In 1935, Byers documented the accumulation of Remediation of sites contaminated with toxic metals is particularly selenium in Astragalus spp. One decade later, Minguzzi challenging. Unlike organic compounds, metals cannot be degraded, and the cleanup usually requires their removal. However, this energy- and Vergnano (1948) identified plants capable of hyperintensive approach can be prohibitively expensive. In addition, the accumulating up to 1% Ni in shoots. Following the idenmetal removing process often employs stringent physicochemical tification of these and other hyperaccumulator species, agents which can dramatically inhibit soil fertility with subsequent a great deal of research has been conducted to elucidate negative impacts on the ecosystem. Phytoremediation has been pro- the physiology and biochemistry of metal hyperaccumuposed as a cost-effective, environmental-friendly alternative technol- lation in plants. Significant results have been obtained, ogy. A great deal of research indicates that plants have the genetic and the understanding of metal accumulating mechapotential to remove many toxic metals from the soil. Despite this nisms substantially advanced. However, a better undpotential, phytoremediation is yet to become a commercially available erstanding of the biological processes is needed if phytechnology. Progress in the field is hindered by a lack of understanding toextraction is to become a reliable, commercially of complex interactions in the rhizosphere and plant-based mechanisms which allow metal translocation and accumulation in plants. In available technology. this paper, four research areas relevant to metal phytoextraction from The success of phytoextraction, as an environmental contaminated soil are reviewed. The review concludes with an assess- cleanup technology, depends on several factors includment of the current status of technology deployment and suggestions ing the extent of soil contamination, metal availability for future phytoremediation research. for uptake into roots (bioavailability), and plant ability to intercept, absorb, and accumulate metals in shoots (Ernst, 1996). Ultimately, the potential for phytoextracP hytoremediation, the use of plants for environmen- tion depends on the interaction between soil, metal, and tal restoration, is an emerging cleanup technology. plant. The complexity of this interaction, controlled by To exploit plant potential to remediate soil and water climatic conditions, argues against generic and in favor contaminated with a variety of compounds, several tech- of a site specific phytoremediating approach. This undernological subsets have been proposed. Phytoextraction lines the importance of understanding the mechanisms is the use of higher plants to remove inorganic contami- and processes that govern metal uptake and accumulanants, primarily metals, from polluted soil. In this ap- tion in plants. In this review, four research areas, releproach, plants capable of accumulating high levels of vant to soil and plant interaction as it relates to metal metals are grown in contaminated soil. At maturity, phytoextraction, have been identified. The significance metal-enriched aboveground biomass is harvested and of these areas is briefly discussed below.

https://clu-in.org/download/remed/lasat_article.pdf

Phytoextraction of toxic metals: a review of biological mechanisms.

This review presents the status of phytoremediation technologies with particular emphasis on phytoextraction of soil heavy metal contamination. Unlike organic compounds, metals cannot be degraded, and cleanup usually requires their removal. Most of the conventional remedial technologies are expensive and inhibit the soil fertility; this subsequently causes negative impacts on the ecosystem. Phytoremediation is a cost effective, environmental friendly, aesthetically pleasing approach most suitable for developing countries. Despite this potential, phytoremediation is yet to become a commercially available technology in India. This paper reports about the mobility, bioavaliability and plant response to presence of soil heavy metals. It classifies the plants according to phytoextraction mechanism and discusses the pathway of metal in plants. Various techniques to enhance phytoextraction and utilization of by-products have been elaborated. Since lot of biomass is produced during this process, it needs proper disposal and management. It also gives an insight into the work done by authors, which focuses on high biomass extractor plants. High biomas weeds were selected to restrict the passage of contaminants into the food chain by selecting non-edible, disease resistant and tolerant plants, which can provide renewable energy. Thus making phytoextraction more viable for present utilization. Keywords. heavy metals, phytoextraction, hyperaccumulator, indicator, excluder species

/pdf/a-review-on-phytoremediation-of-heavy-metals-and-utilization-46zsd246t0.pdf

A review on phytoremediation of heavy metals and utilization of its byproducts.

1 Although its importance for plant mineral nutrition and nutrient cycling has long been recognized, the soil community has rarely been integrated into dynamical frameworks of plant populations, in spite of abundant evidence for its involvement. The concept of feedback may provide theoretical and experimental tools for investigating the importance of the soil community in the population ecology and evolution of plants. 2 A mathematical model demonstrates the potential for two divergent dynamics, with positive feedback leading to the loss of diversity at a local scale and negative feedback leading to its maintenance. A linear contrast of the growth of plants in association with their own soil communities compared to the growth of plants in association with each others' soil communities can be used to differentiate between these possibilities in empirical studies. 3 Spatially explicit computer simulations demonstrate that the dynamics of a spatially structured community, as the soil community is likely to be, can differ from those predicted for a well-mixed population. Specifically, diversity can be maintained between locally homogeneous patches when positive feedback and dispersal occur at local scales. 4 Using a simple experimental protocol, we have found substantial negative feedback on plant growth through the soil community, suggesting that it may be involved in the maintenance of plant species diversity. 5 We discuss the importance of the soil community in other areas of plant ecology and evolution, including the suggestion that interactions with the soil community may be involved in the maintenance of sexual or asexual reproductive systems.

Incorporating the soil community into plant population dynamics: the utility of the feedback approach.

Phytoremediation of metals: using plants to remove pollutants from the environment

Most bacteria, fungi, and some plants respond to Fe stress by the induction of high-affinity Fe transport systems that utilize biosynthetic chelates called siderophores. To competitively acquire Fe, some microbes have transport systems that enable them to use other siderophore types in addition to their own. Bacteria such as Escherichia coli achieve this ability by using a combination of separate siderophore receptors and transporters, whereas other microbial species, such as Streptomyces pilosus, use a low specificity, high-affinity transport system that recognizes more than one siderophore type. By either strategy, such versatility may provide an advantage under Fe-limiting conditions; allowing use of siderophores produced at another organism’s expense, or Fe acquisition from siderophores that could otherwise sequester Fe in an unavailable form.

C. P. P. Reid

Papers

Mechanisms of iron acquisition from siderophores by microorganisms and plants