C
Camilla Gobbo
Researcher at University of Padua
Publications - 19
Citations - 613
Camilla Gobbo is an academic researcher from University of Padua. The author has contributed to research in topics: Recall & Valence (psychology). The author has an hindex of 11, co-authored 19 publications receiving 587 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
How knowledge is structured and used by expert and novice children
TL;DR: Differences in the structure and use of knowledge provide a possible explanation of why expert children can better use and access their knowledge because it is more cohesive and integrated, than can novice children.
BookDOI
Cognitive Development : Neo-Piagetian Perspectives
TL;DR: Neo-Piagetian Cognitive Development as discussed by the authors provides a unique critical analysis and a comparison of concepts across neo-piagetians' theories, and evidences the exciting possibilities for neo-Piagateian research to build connections both with other theoretical approaches such as dynamic systems and with other fields such as brain science.
Journal ArticleDOI
Teachers' beliefs and integration of information and communications technology in Italian schools
Camilla Gobbo,Marta Girardi +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, teachers with high and low levels of competence in ICT were interviewed in order to examine their beliefs, perceptions, and experiences related to teaching with and without the computer.
Journal ArticleDOI
Assessing the effects of misinformation on children's recall: how and when makes a difference
TL;DR: This paper found that older children were less suggestible than younger children when information was central rather than peripheral and when the misinformation contradicted rather than supplemented the original event, and less adaptable over time in the absence of further suggestions.
Journal ArticleDOI
Knowing in advance: the impact of prior event information on memory and event knowledge.
TL;DR: Advice specific to the event led to better recall and better integration of the experience into a general event representation both soon after the event and at a follow-up interview 4 months later, whereas general discussion of the topic without the event specific information neither enhanced memory reports nor facilitated the integration of event information.