scispace - formally typeset
C

Carlos Francisco Moreno-García

Researcher at Robert Gordon University

Publications -  54
Citations -  422

Carlos Francisco Moreno-García is an academic researcher from Robert Gordon University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Computer science & Segmentation. The author has an hindex of 9, co-authored 43 publications receiving 248 citations. Previous affiliations of Carlos Francisco Moreno-García include Rovira i Virgili University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

New trends on digitisation of complex engineering drawings.

TL;DR: This paper presents a general framework for complex engineering drawing digitisation, a thorough and critical review of relevant literature, methods and algorithms in machine learning and machine vision, and how new trends on machine vision could be applied to this domain.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effectiveness of social marketing strategies to reduce youth obesity in European school-based interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

TL;DR: Current evidence indicates that the inclusion of at least 5 SMBC domains in school-based interventions could benefit efforts to prevent obesity in young people.
Journal ArticleDOI

CDSMOTE: class decomposition and synthetic minority class oversampling technique for imbalanced-data classification

TL;DR: This paper proposes a new hybrid approach aiming at reducing the dominance of the majority class instances using class decomposition and increasing the minorityclass instances using an oversampling method, resulting in a more balanced dataset and hence improving the results.
Book ChapterDOI

A graph repository for learning error-tolerant graph matching.

TL;DR: A graph repository structure such that each register is not only composed of a graph and its class, but also of a pair of graphs and a ground-truth correspondence between them, as well as their class is presented.
Journal ArticleDOI

Using artificial intelligence methods for systematic review in health sciences: A systematic review

TL;DR: The ambiguous benefits of the data extractions, combined with the reported advantages from 10 reviews, indicating that AI platforms have taken hold with varying success in evidence synthesis, are qualified by the reliance on the self‐reporting of the review authors.