scispace - formally typeset
C

Caroline Larue

Researcher at Université de Montréal

Publications -  53
Citations -  1013

Caroline Larue is an academic researcher from Université de Montréal. The author has contributed to research in topics: Seclusion & Poison control. The author has an hindex of 16, co-authored 44 publications receiving 745 citations. Previous affiliations of Caroline Larue include University of Victoria.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluation of seclusion and restraint reduction programs in mental health: a systematic review

TL;DR: Despite wide variability in SR indicators and methodological rigor, it remains that the outcomes argue in favor of SR reduction program implementation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Factors influencing decisions on seclusion and restraint

TL;DR: The purpose of this paper is to set out and categorize the factors in play in aggression- and agitation-management situations as perceived by the healthcare teams, particularly the nurses, to reduce recourse to coercive measures and enhance professional practices.
Journal ArticleDOI

Learning theories and tools for the assessment of core nursing competencies in simulation: A theoretical review

TL;DR: This review highlighted the fact that few studies examined the use of simulation in nursing education through learning theories and via assessment of core competencies, and identified observational tools used to assess competencies in action, as holistic and context-dependent constructs.
Journal ArticleDOI

Simulation in preparation or substitution for clinical placement: A systematic review of the literature

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors conducted a systematic review of the literature between 2008 and 2014 and found that substitution of clinical placement with simulation does not seem to have a significant impact on clinical competency, critical thinking, knowledge acquisition, and self-confidence.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Experience of Seclusion and Restraint in Psychiatric Settings: Perspectives of Patients

TL;DR: Patients had a nuanced perception of SR: Some felt that SR was a helpful measure, while others felt thatSR was not a helpful measures, and nearly all patients perceived that the health care team did not follow-up with the patients after the experience; such follow- up is essential for reconstructing a sometimes confusing event.