Thank you for downloading using multivariate statistics. As you may know, people have look hundreds times for their favorite novels like this using multivariate statistics, but end up in infectious downloads. Rather than reading a good book with a cup of tea in the afternoon, instead they juggled with some harmful bugs inside their laptop. using multivariate statistics is available in our digital library an online access to it is set as public so you can download it instantly. Our books collection saves in multiple locations, allowing you to get the most less latency time to download any of our books like this one. Merely said, the using multivariate statistics is universally compatible with any devices to read.

Using Multivariate Statistics

Background Although insomnia is a prevalent complaint with significant morbidity, it often remains unrecognized and untreated. Brief and valid instruments are needed both for screening and outcome assessment. This study examined psychometric indices of the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) to detect cases of insomnia in a population-based sample and to evaluate treatment response in a clinical sample. Methods Participants were 959 individuals selected from the community for an epidemiological study of insomnia (Community sample) and 183 individuals evaluated for insomnia treatment and 62 controls without insomnia (Clinical sample). They completed the ISI and several measures of sleep quality, fatigue, psychological symptoms, and quality of life; those in the Clinical sample also completed sleep diaries, polysomnography, and interviews to validate their insomnia/good sleep status and assess treatment response. In addition to standard psychometric indices of reliability and validity, item response theory analyses were computed to examine ISI item response patterns. Receiver operating curves were used to derive optimal cutoff scores for case identification and to quantify the minimally important changes in relation to global improvement ratings obtained by an independent assessor. Results ISI internal consistency was excellent for both samples (Cronbach α of 0.90 and 0.91). Item response analyses revealed adequate discriminatory capacity for 5 of the 7 items. Convergent validity was supported by significant correlations between total ISI score and measures of fatigue, quality of life, anxiety, and depression. A cutoff score of 10 was optimal (86.1% sensitivity and 87.7% specificity) for detecting insomnia cases in the community sample. In the clinical sample, a change score of -8.4 points (95% CI: -7.1, -9.4) was associated with moderate improvement as rated by an independent assessor after treatment. Conclusion These findings provide further evidence that the ISI is a reliable and valid instrument to detect cases of insomnia in the population and is sensitive to treatment response in clinical patients.

/pdf/the-insomnia-severity-index-psychometric-indicators-to-18yvovderi.pdf

The Insomnia Severity Index: psychometric indicators to detect insomnia cases and evaluate treatment response.

(1998). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. Gifted and Talented International: Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 97-98.

Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies

Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule

Definition: To what extent does the study allow us to draw conclusions about a causal effect between two or more constructs? Issues: Selection, maturation, history, mortality, testing, regression towrd the mean, selection by maturation, treatment by mortality, treatment by testing, measured treatment variables Increase: Eliminate the threats, above all do experimental manipulations, random assignment, and counterbalancing.

Reliability and validity

Epidemiology of insomnia: prevalence, self-help treatments, consultations, and determinants of help-seeking behaviors.

Context Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and hypnotic medications are efficacious for short-term treatment of insomnia, but few patients achieve complete remission with any single treatment. It is unclear whether combined or maintenance therapies would enhance outcome. Objectives To evaluate the added value of medication over CBT alone for acute treatment of insomnia and the effects of maintenance therapies on long-term outcome. Design, Setting, and Patients Prospective, randomized controlled trial involving 2-stage therapy for 160 adults with persistent insomnia treated at a university hospital sleep center in Canada between January 2002 and April 2005. Interventions Participants received CBT alone or CBT plus 10 mg/d (taken at bedtime) of zolpidem for an initial 6-week therapy, followed by extended 6-month therapy. Patients initially treated with CBT attended monthly maintenance CBT for 6 months or received no additional treatment and those initially treated with combined therapy (CBT plus 10 mg/d of zolpidem) continued with CBT plus intermittent use of zolpidem or CBT only. Main Outcome Measures Sleep onset latency, time awake after sleep onset, total sleep time, and sleep efficiency derived from daily diaries (primary outcomes); treatment response and remission rates derived from the Insomnia Severity Index (secondary outcomes). Results Cognitive behavioral therapy used singly or in combination with zolpidem produced significant improvements in sleep latency, time awake after sleep onset, and sleep efficiency during initial therapy (all P Conclusion In patients with persistent insomnia, the addition of medication to CBT produced added benefits during acute therapy, but long-term outcome was optimized when medication is discontinued during maintenance CBT. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00042146

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/183931/joc90042_2005_2015.pdf

Cognitive behavioral therapy, singly and combined with medication, for persistent insomnia: a randomized controlled trial.

Objective: The presence of anxiety disorders (AD) in schizophrenia (SZ) is attracting increasing interest. However, published studies have yielded very broad variations in prevalence rates across studies. The current meta-analysis sought to (1) investigate the prevalence of co-occurring AD in SZ by reporting pooled prevalence rates and (2) identify potential sources of variations in reported rates that could guide our efforts to identify and treat these co-occurring disorders in patients with SZ. Methods: We performed a systematic search of studies reporting prevalence of AD in SZ and related psychotic disorders. Mean prevalence rates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were first computed for each disorder. We then examined the impact of potential moderators related to patient sampling or to AD assessment methods on these rates. Results: Fifty-two eligible studies were identified. Pooled prevalence rates and CIs were 12.1% (7.0%–17.1%) for obsessive-compulsive disorders, 14.9% (8.1%–21.8%) for social phobia, 10.9% (2.9%–18.8%) for generalized AD, 9.8% (4.3%–15.4%) for panic disorders, and 12.4% (4.0%–20.8%) for post-traumatic stress disorders. For all disorders, we found significant heterogeneity in rates across studies. This heterogeneity could at least partially be explained by the effect of moderator variables related to patient characteristics or assessment methods. Conclusions: AD are highly prevalent in SZ, but important variations in rates are observed between studies. This meta-analysis highlights several factors that affect risk for, or detection of AD in SZ, and could, thus, have an important impact on treatment and outcome of SZ patients.

/pdf/how-prevalent-are-anxiety-disorders-in-schizophrenia-a-meta-2oqvpl9o6a.pdf

How Prevalent Are Anxiety Disorders in Schizophrenia? A Meta-Analysis and Critical Review on a Significant Association

Background Despite its high prevalence, little information is available about the natural history of insomnia. The extent to which episodes of insomnia will persist or remit over time is difficult to predict. We examined the natural history of insomnia and describe the most common trajectories over 3 years. Methods Three hundred eighty-eight adults (mean [SD] age, 44.8 [13.9] years; 61% women) were selected from a larger population-based sample on the basis of the presence of insomnia at baseline. They completed standardized sleep/insomnia questionnaires at 3 annual follow-up assessments. For each follow-up assessment, participants were classified into 1 of 3 groups (individuals with an insomnia syndrome, individuals with insomnia symptoms, and individuals with good sleep) on the basis of algorithms using standard diagnostic criteria for insomnia. Rates of persistent insomnia, remission, and relapse were computed for each group. Results Of the study sample, 74% reported insomnia for at least 1 year (2 consecutive assessments) and 46% reported insomnia persisting over the entire 3-year study. The course of insomnia was more likely to be persistent in those with more severe insomnia at baseline (ie, insomnia syndrome) and in women and older adults. Remission rate was 54%; however, 27% of those with remission of insomnia eventually experienced relapse. Individuals with subsyndromal insomnia at baseline were 3 times more likely to remit than worsen to syndrome status, although persistence was the most frequent course in that group as well. Conclusion These findings indicate that insomnia is often a persistent condition, in particular when it reaches the diagnostic threshold for an insomnia disorder.

/pdf/the-natural-history-of-insomnia-a-population-based-3-year-2fl8n3y4je.pdf

The Natural History of Insomnia : A Population-Based 3-Year Longitudinal Study

INSOMNIA IS AMONG THE MOST PREVALENT HEALTH COMPLAINTS. APPROXIMATELY 9% OF THE GENERAL POPULATION REGULARLY SUFFER FROM INSOMNIA, and about 30% do so occasionally.1–3 Incidence rates reported in longitudinal studies vary extensively (from 3% to 20%), depending on the population studied, the time interval (e.g., 1 year versus 10 years), and the definition of insomnia used (i.e., insomnia syndrome versus symptoms). For instance, it is estimated that over a period of one year, approximately 6% of the general population develop an insomnia syndrome,4 and approximately 20% develop insomnia symptoms, with the latter figures being based on samples of older adults5 and individuals with chronic health problems.6 Furthermore, new onset of insomnia is generally more frequent among women and individuals with medical conditions, psychiatric disorders, and a perceived stressful life.4,7–9

Based on a tripartite conceptual framework widely used to explain the development of insomnia,10–12 3 types of factors are involved at different times during the course of insomnia. First, everyone is, to some degree, predisposed to develop insomnia. Second, a precipitating event is usually associated with the onset of insomnia. Third, insomnia is perpetuated over time by psychological and behavioral factors, even after precipitating factors have been controlled or eliminated. The most commonly hypothesized predisposing factors include demographic factors (e.g., aging, female gender, living alone),1,3,13 familial/hereditary conditions (a personal or family history of insomnia),14–16 psychological factors (e.g., anxiety, depression, personality traits),4,17–19 and physiological and lifestyle factors (e.g., arousability and smoking).20,21 Precipitating factors include stressful life events (e.g., divorce),9,22 as well as psychological and health-related factors (e.g., pain, mental health problems).10,23 Finally, maintaining factors include maladaptive sleep habits (e.g., excessive amounts of time spent in bed, napping, chronic medication use) and dysfunctional cognitions about sleep loss and its impact on life (e.g., worry over sleep loss).10

Most studies investigating insomnia risk factors have been either retrospective or cross-sectional, precluding unequivocal inference about the relationship between these factors and the development of insomnia. The extent to which depression and anxiety trigger insomnia or represent consequences of insomnia remains ambiguous. The few longitudinal studies of insomnia have provided informative data about incidence and risk factors, although most of those studies have focused predominantly on selected samples such as young adults,7,28 elderly adults,8,24,25 or patients attending medical practices.6,26,27 Only one longitudinal study evaluating the relation between sleep problem symptoms (i.e., insomnia and hypersomnia) and psychiatric disorders sampled the population at large.4

Few studies have used standard diagnostic criteria to define insomnia. Moreover, previous studies have used various time frames and most have not adequately operationalized their measure of incidence. For instance, most studies have not differentiated between incident cases of first episode of insomnia (no prior history of insomnia) and cases of recurrence (with past history of insomnia). Furthermore, the majority of studies included only individuals experiencing insomnia at the time of the second assessment in their incidence estimates5,6,8,29 rather than all cases emerging during the interval between baseline and follow-up assessment.7 Since insomnia may prove transient or episodic, incidence rates may have been underestimated in previous studies. The National Institutes of Health30 called for additional longitudinal studies using well-operationalized and stringent diagnostic criteria to estimate insomnia incidence and identify risk factors within the general population.

The objectives of this study were to estimate the incidence of insomnia symptoms and syndrome and to identify associated risk factors in a cohort of good sleepers sampled from the general population and followed over a one-year period.

/pdf/incidence-and-risk-factors-of-insomnia-in-a-population-based-nlodrd0i9g.pdf

Chantal Mérette

Papers

Epidemiology of insomnia: prevalence, self-help treatments, consultations, and determinants of help-seeking behaviors.

Cognitive behavioral therapy, singly and combined with medication, for persistent insomnia: a randomized controlled trial.

How Prevalent Are Anxiety Disorders in Schizophrenia? A Meta-Analysis and Critical Review on a Significant Association

The Natural History of Insomnia : A Population-Based 3-Year Longitudinal Study

Incidence and risk factors of insomnia in a population-based sample.