scispace - formally typeset
C

Charles C. Turner

Researcher at California State University, Chico

Publications -  11
Citations -  86

Charles C. Turner is an academic researcher from California State University, Chico. The author has contributed to research in topics: Politics & Supreme court. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 11 publications receiving 82 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Means, Motive, and Opportunity: Politics, Community Needs, and Community Oriented Policing Services Grants

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined how local politicians weigh their electoral desires against community needs in their decisions to apply for grants and how national politicians and bureaucrats similarly determine their responses to cities' requests.
Journal ArticleDOI

What We Mean by Scope and Methods: A Survey of Undergraduate Scope and Methods Courses.

TL;DR: For instance, the authors survey results from a nationwide sample of political science departments indicate that most departments require a scope and methods course of their majors and that, while there is a great deal of variety in topics covered, some common themes exist and some common assignments are used.
Journal ArticleDOI

Disagreement on the Rehnquist Court: The Dynamics of Supreme Court Concurrence

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine the themes of justices' concurrences and find that the majority often pursues at least one of the following activities: ground laying, weakening, signaling, or preserving.
Journal ArticleDOI

A New Honesty for a New Game: Distinguishing Cheating from Learning in a Web-Based Testing Environment

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors identify five behavioral options for students presented with web quiz assignments, four of which would be considered "categorical cheating" and three of which are considered "non-categoric cheating".
Journal ArticleDOI

The Rise of the Choral Court: Use of Concurrence in the Burger and Rehnquist Courts

TL;DR: The authors argue that justices use concurrences as a means to define their goals when writing concurcations, and they extend Baum's contention that justices' goals are bifurcated.