scispace - formally typeset
C

Chelsey Narvey

Researcher at Sam Houston State University

Publications -  18
Citations -  361

Chelsey Narvey is an academic researcher from Sam Houston State University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Recidivism & Empathy. The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 14 publications receiving 177 citations. Previous affiliations of Chelsey Narvey include University of Texas at Dallas.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Are there Psychopaths in White-Collar Jobs?

TL;DR: The adverse, antisocial behavior of psychopaths has been studied for quite some time, yet there remai... as discussed by the authors has been an important topic of study in psychology and increasingly in criminology.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Keepers: Returning Citizens’ Experiences With Prison Staff Misconduct:

TL;DR: For example, this paper pointed out thatCorrectional staff play a major role in the incarceration experience for millions of U.S. adults each year, and while much research has addressed misconduct perpetrated by incarcerated persons, less ha...
Journal ArticleDOI

Understanding the Link Between Family Economic Hardship and Children’s Bullying Behavior

TL;DR: The authors examined the kinds of factors that may mediate this relationship and found a link between family economic hardship and children's bullying involvement, but they did not examine the factors that might explain this relationship.
Journal ArticleDOI

Countries where Women Have more Positive Interactions with Economic Decisions and Legal Rights Have Lower Homicide Rates: an Exploratory Study

TL;DR: This paper found that countries where women experience more gender discrimination in economic and family decisions have higher homicide rates, while countries with the least discrimination have the lowest overall average average homicide rate, and that countries grouped by their level of discrimination experience significantly different overall homicide rates.
Journal ArticleDOI

Reply to Gonzalez et al.

TL;DR: The errors, contradictions, inconsistencies, and tone of the commentary, unfortunately demand the authors' attention, and because journal space is precious, the thoughts on their work are provided and some key differences are highlighted.