C
Chii Jen Chen
Researcher at National Chung Cheng University
Publications - 7
Citations - 324
Chii Jen Chen is an academic researcher from National Chung Cheng University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Breast ultrasound & Internal medicine. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 5 publications receiving 308 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Classification of breast ultrasound images using fractal feature.
Dar-Ren Chen,Ruey-Feng Chang,Chii Jen Chen,Ming Feng Ho,S. J. Kuo,Shou Tung Chen,Shin Jer Hung,Woo Kyung Moon +7 more
TL;DR: A computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system based on the fractal analysis is proposed to classify the breast lesions into two classes: benign and malignant and the k-means classification method is used to classify benign tumors from malignant ones.
Journal ArticleDOI
Tamper detection and recovery for medical images using near-lossless information hiding technique.
Jeffery H. K. Wu,Ruey-Feng Chang,Chii Jen Chen,Ching Lin Wang,Ta Hsun Kuo,Woo Kyung Moon,Dar-Ren Chen +6 more
TL;DR: The proposed near-lossless method is proven to effectively detect a tampered medical image and recover the original ROI image.
Journal ArticleDOI
Solid Breast Masses: Classification with Computer-aided Analysis of Continuous US Images Obtained with Probe Compression
TL;DR: Continuous US images obtained with probe compression and computer-aided analysis can aid in classification of benign and malignant breast tumors.
Journal ArticleDOI
2-D ultrasound strain images for breast cancer diagnosis using nonrigid subregion registration
TL;DR: This study evaluated the accuracy of continuous US strain image in the classification of benign from malignant breast tumors and proposed a computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) system by utilizing the nonrigid image registration modality on the analysis of tumor deformation.
Journal ArticleDOI
Three-dimensional ultrasound in margin evaluation for breast tumor excision using Mammotome.
TL;DR: From the results, the safe margin was not satisfactory in all directions, because the minimum differences measured by the proposed algorithm were not large enough in all five cases, and this was proved from two malignant mastectomy specimens.