scispace - formally typeset
C

Christopher B. Edgar

Researcher at University of Minnesota

Publications -  13
Citations -  224

Christopher B. Edgar is an academic researcher from University of Minnesota. The author has contributed to research in topics: Forest inventory & Drought tolerance. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 11 publications receiving 143 citations. Previous affiliations of Christopher B. Edgar include United States Forest Service.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Tree mortality from an exceptional drought spanning mesic to semiarid ecoregions

TL;DR: A widespread tree mortality event that resulted from the worst 1-year drought on record for the state of Texas, USA is investigated, highlighting that drought-driven mortality alters forest structure differently across climatic regions and genera.
Journal ArticleDOI

Annual monitoring of US timber production: rationale and design

TL;DR: The reasoning for moving to an annual timber products monitoring program is presented and a comparison of sample designs is presented to facilitate an annual program without increased effort, finding that both probability proportional to size and stratified simple random sampling designs were viable options, but the stratifiedsimple random sampling design provided more flexibility.
Journal ArticleDOI

Productivity of aspen forests in northeastern Minnesota, U.S.A., as related to stand composition and canopy structure

TL;DR: Investigation of relationships among stand composition, stemwood productivity, and canopy structure in northeastern Minnesota found aspen, primarily quaking and to a lesser degree bigtooth, was a significant component of every study area.
Journal ArticleDOI

Interpreting effects of multiple, large-scale disturbances using national forest inventory data: A case study of standing dead trees in east Texas, USA

TL;DR: In this article, the authors compare how temporal aggregation approaches with NFI data affects estimates of standing dead trees as these respond to extreme disturbance events, and they find that interpretations of disturbance event impacts varied depending on which sets of estimates were considered.