Background: Frailty is considered highly prevalent in old age and to confer high risk for falls, disability, hospitalization, and mortality. Frailty has been considered synonymous with disability, comorbidity, and other characteristics, but it is recognized that it may have a biologic basis and be a distinct clinical syndrome. A standardized definition has not yet been established. 

Methods: To develop and operationalize a phenotype of frailty in older adults and assess concurrent and predictive validity, the study used data from the Cardiovascular Health Study. Participants were 5,317 men and women 65 years and older (4,735 from an original cohort recruited in 1989-90 and 582 from an African American cohort recruited in 1992-93). Both cohorts received almost identical baseline evaluations and 7 and 4 years of follow-up, respectively, with annual examinations and surveillance for outcomes including incident disease, hospitalization, falls, disability, and mortality. 

Results: Frailty was defined as a clinical syndrome in which three or more of the following criteria were present: unintentional weight loss (10 lbs in past year), self-reported exhaustion, weakness (grip strength), slow walking speed, and low physical activity. The overall prevalence of frailty in this community-dwelling population was 6.9%; it increased with age and was greater in women than men. Four-year incidence was 7.2%. Frailty was associated with being African American, having lower education and income, poorer health, and having higher rates of comorbid chronic diseases and disability. There was overlap, but not concordance, in the cooccurrence of frailty, comorbidity, and disability. This frailty phenotype was independently predictive (over 3 years) of incident falls, worsening mobility or ADL disability, hospitalization, and death, with hazard ratios ranging from 1.82 to 4.46, unadjusted, and 1.29-2.24, adjusted for a number of health, disease, and social characteristics predictive of 5-year mortality. Intermediate frailty status, as indicated by the presence of one or two criteria, showed intermediate risk of these outcomes as well as increased risk of becoming frail over 3-4 years of follow-up (odds ratios for incident frailty = 4.51 unadjusted and 2.63 adjusted for covariates, compared to those with no frailty criteria at baseline). 

Conclusions: This study provides a potential standardized definition for frailty in community-dwelling older adults and offers concurrent and predictive validity for the definition. It also finds that there is an intermediate stage identifying those at high risk of frailty. Finally, it provides evidence that frailty is not synonymous with either comorbidity or disability, but comorbidity is an etiologic risk factor for, and disability is an outcome of, frailty. This provides a potential basis for clinical assessment for those who are frail or at risk, and for future research to develop interventions for frailty based on a standardized ascertainment of frailty.

https://www.sharp.com/services/hospice/upload/phenotype5-13.pdf

Frailty in Older Adults Evidence for a Phenotype

Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group : Frailty in older adults : evidence for a phenotype

Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Approximately 30 per cent of people over 65 years of age and living in the community fall each year; the number is higher in institutions Although less than one fall in 10 results in a fracture, a fifth of fall incidents require medical attention OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of interventions designed to reduce the incidence of falls in elderly people (living in the community, or in institutional or hospital care) SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (January 2003), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to February 2003), EMBASE (1988 to 2003 Week 19), CINAHL (1982 to April 2003), The National Research Register, Issue 2, 2003, Current Controlled Trials (wwwcontrolled-trialscom accessed 11 July 2003) and reference lists of articles No language restrictions were applied Further trials were identified by contact with researchers in the field SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of interventions designed to minimise the effect of, or exposure to, risk factors for falling in elderly people Main outcomes of interest were the number of fallers, or falls Trials reporting only intermediate outcomes were excluded DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data Data were pooled using the fixed effect model where appropriate MAIN RESULTS: Sixty two trials involving 21,668 people were includedInterventions likely to be beneficial:Multidisciplinary, multifactorial, health/environmental risk factor screening/intervention programmes in the community both for an unselected population of older people (4 trials, 1651 participants, pooled RR 073, 95%CI 063 to 085), and for older people with a history of falling or selected because of known risk factors (5 trials, 1176 participants, pooled RR 086, 95%CI 076 to 098), and in residential care facilities (1 trial, 439 participants, cluster-adjusted incidence rate ratio 060, 95%CI 050 to 073) A programme of muscle strengthening and balance retraining, individually prescribed at home by a trained health professional (3 trials, 566 participants, pooled relative risk (RR) 080, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 066 to 098) Home hazard assessment and modification that is professionally prescribed for older people with a history of falling (3 trials, 374 participants, RR 066, 95% CI 054 to 081) Withdrawal of psychotropic medication (1 trial, 93 participants, relative hazard 034, 95%CI 016 to 074) Cardiac pacing for fallers with cardioinhibitory carotid sinus hypersensitivity (1 trial, 175 participants, WMD -520, 95%CI -940 to -100) A 15 week Tai Chi group exercise intervention (1 trial, 200 participants, risk ratio 051, 95%CI 036 to 073) Interventions of unknown effectiveness:Group-delivered exercise interventions (9 trials, 1387 participants) Individual lower limb strength training (1 trial, 222 participants) Nutritional supplementation (1 trial, 46 participants) Vitamin D supplementation, with or without calcium (3 trials, 461 participants) Home hazard modification in association with advice on optimising medication (1 trial, 658 participants), or in association with an education package on exercise and reducing fall risk (1 trial, 3182 participants) Pharmacological therapy (raubasine-dihydroergocristine, 1 trial, 95 participants) Interventions using a cognitive/behavioural approach alone (2 trials, 145 participants) Home hazard modification for older people without a history of falling (1 trial, 530 participants) Hormone replacement therapy (1 trial, 116 participants) Correction of visual deficiency (1 trial, 276 participants)Interventions unlikely to be beneficial:Brisk walking in women with an upper limb fracture in the previous two years (1 trial, 165 participants) AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to prevent falls that are likely to be effective are now available; less is known about their effectiveness in preventing fall-related injuries Costs per fall prevented have been established for four of the interventions and careful economic modelling in the context of the local healthcare system is important Some potential interventions are of unknown effectiveness and further research is indicated Language: en

Interventions for preventing falls in elderly people

OBJECTIVES: To describe the changes in activities of daily living (ADL) function occurring before and after hospital admission in older people hospitalized with medical illness and to assess the effect of age on loss of ADL function.

DESIGN: Prospective observational study.

SETTING: The general medical service of two hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS: Two thousand two hundred ninety-three patients aged 70 and older (mean age 80, 64% women, 24% nonwhite).

MEASUREMENTS: At the time of hospital admission, patients or their surrogates were interviewed about their independence in five ADLs (bathing, dressing, eating, transferring, and toileting) 2 weeks before admission (baseline) and at admission. Subjects were interviewed about ADL function at discharge. Outcome measures included functional decline between baseline and discharge and functional changes between baseline and admission and between admission and discharge.

RESULTS: Thirty-five percent of patients declined in ADL function between baseline and discharge. This included the 23% of patients who declined between baseline and admission and failed to recover to baseline function between admission and discharge and the 12% of patients who did not decline between baseline and admission but declined between hospital admission and discharge. Twenty percent of patients declined between baseline and admission but recovered to baseline function between admission and discharge. The frequency of ADL decline between baseline and discharge varied markedly with age (23%, 28%, 38%, 50%, and 63% in patients aged 70–74, 75–79, 80–84, 85–89, and ≥90, respectively, P < .001). After adjustment for potential confounders, age was not associated with ADL decline before hospitalization (odds ratio (OR) for patients aged ≥90 compared with patients aged 70–74 = 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.88–1.82). In contrast, age was associated with the failure to recover ADL function during hospitalization in patients who declined before admission (OR for patients aged ≥90 compared with patients aged 70–74 = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.20–3.65) and with new losses of ADL function during hospitalization in patients who did not decline before admission (OR for patients aged ≥90 compared with patients aged 70–74 = 3.43, 95% CI = 1.92–6.12).

CONCLUSION: Many hospitalized older people are discharged with ADL function that is worse than their baseline function. The oldest patients are at particularly high risk of poor functional outcomes because they are less likely to recover ADL function lost before admission and more likely to develop new functional deficits during hospitalization

Loss of independence in activities of daily living in older adults hospitalized with medical illnesses: increased vulnerability with age.

Study Objective:To evaluate the impact of a geriatric consultation team on the functional status of hospitalized elderly patients. Design:Randomized controlled clinical trial. Setting:Univ...

Effect of a Geriatric Consultation Team on Functional Status of Elderly Hospitalized Patients: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

As part of a prospective, randomized, controlled study of the effectiveness of a geriatric consultation team, we examined compliance by the house staff with recommendations made by the team. Recommendations were formulated for 185 patients, aged 75 years or older, who were randomized into intervention (n = 92) and control (n=93) groups. In the control group, only 27.1% of the actions that would have been recommended by the team were implemented independently by the house staff. Problems commonly neglected included polypharmacy, sensory impairment, confusion, and depression. In the intervention group, overall compliance was 71.7%. Highest compliance occurred for recommendations addressing instability and falls (95.0%) and discharge planning (94.3%). We conclude that a geriatric consultation team contributes substantial additional input into the care of older patients. Furthermore, relatively high compliance can be achieved with recommendations made by a geriatric consultation team, thereby overcoming the first barrier to the establishment of such a service. (JAMA1986;255:2617-2621)

https://jamanetwork.com/HttpHandlers/ArticlePdfHandler.ashx?journal=JAMA&articleId=404218&pdfFileName=jama_255_19_032.pdf

A randomized, controlled clinical trial of a geriatric consultation team. Compliance with recommendations.

As part of a controlled clinical trial of a geriatric consultation team (GCT), we investigated whether a GCT could affect the incidence of hospital-acquired complications in elderly patients. One hundred eighty-five patients, aged 75 years and older, were randomized into an intervention (N = 92) and a control (N = 93) group. Members of the intervention group received a GCT consultation and were routinely followed up throughout their hospitalization. The incidence of hospital-acquired complications for the entire study population was 38%. The type and rate of hospital-acquired complications in the intervention and control groups were not significantly different. Functional status on admission and admission to the psychiatry service were predictive for the occurrence of a hospital-acquired complication. In a broadly selected population such as this, the intensity of care available through a GCT was unable to reduce the occurrence of hospital-acquired complications. However, since this is only one aspect of a GCT function, and others may be of great importance, such aspects, and more targeted populations, must be evaluated before final conclusions can be reached about GCT efficiency. ( JAMA 1987;257:2313-2317)

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/365870/jama_257_17_030.pdf

Hospital-Acquired Complications in a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of a Geriatric Consultation Team

Impact of a Geriatric Consultation Team on Discharge Placement and Repeat Hospitalization

Objective: To determine predictors of 2-year post-hospitalization mortality in a cohort of elderly hospitalized patients originally assembled to assess the impact of a Geriatric Consultation Team (GCT).



Objective: Two-year follow-up of an inception cohort.



Setting: University-affiliated tertiary care VA Medical Center.



Patients: One hundred sixty-seven veterans age 75 or older discharged following hospitalization on medical, surgical, or psychiatry services but not intensive care units.



Intervention: None specifically studied here though cohort was previously part of randomized control trial of a Geriatric Consultation Team.



Measurement: Mortality during 2 years of post-hospitalization follow-up.



Results: Two-year post-hospitalization mortality was 28 percent with no difference between the original GCT and control groups. For the entire sample, age, mental status, admission or discharge ADLs (but not change in ADL status), number of admission problems, number of discharge diagnoses, and discharge site were significant predictors of mortality in univariate analysis. Only discharge ADLs and discharge site remained significant in multivariate analysis.



Conclusion: Measures of ADLs during hospitalization are stronger predictors of mortality following hospitalization than disease diagnoses. Impaired ADLs and placement other than at home are significant predictors of mortality, suggesting that the decision for nursing home placement contains other independently predictive information within it and/or that the subsequent nursing home period produces excess mortality. As had been indicated in short-term follow-up, there was no survival advantage for the Geriatric Consultation Group. J Am Geriatr Soc 40:1231–1235, 1992

Constance C. Saltz

Papers

Effect of a Geriatric Consultation Team on Functional Status of Elderly Hospitalized Patients: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

A randomized, controlled clinical trial of a geriatric consultation team. Compliance with recommendations.

Hospital-Acquired Complications in a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of a Geriatric Consultation Team

Impact of a Geriatric Consultation Team on Discharge Placement and Repeat Hospitalization

Predictors of two-year post-hospitalization mortality among elderly veterans in a study evaluating a geriatric consultation team.