Biological materials: Structure and mechanical properties

2.3. Amorphous Minerals 4354 3. Biological Routes to Controlling Morphology 4354 3.1. General Mechanisms 4356 3.1.1. Soluble and Insoluble Organic Molecules 4356 3.1.2. Control over Crystal Polymorph 4357 3.1.3. Control over Crystal Orientation 4359 3.2. Single-Crystal Biominerals 4359 3.2.1. Organic and Inorganic Soluble Additives 4360 3.2.2. Templating of Single-Crystal Morphologies 4361 3.3. Polycrystalline Biominerals 4366 3.3.1. Nacre Formation in Mollusks 4366 3.3.2. ForaminiferasA Biogenic Mesocrystal 4368 3.4. Amorphous Biominerals 4370 3.4.1. Silicification in Diatoms 4370 3.4.2. In Vitro Studies of Silicification in Diatoms 4371 4. Bioinspired Routes to Controlling Crystal Morphologies 4371

Controlling Mineral Morphologies and Structures in Biological and Synthetic Systems

Natural materials are renowned for their strength and toughness1,2,3,4,5. Spider dragline silk has a breakage energy per unit weight two orders of magnitude greater than high tensile steel1,6, and is representative of many other strong natural fibres3,7,8. The abalone shell, a composite of calcium carbonate plates sandwiched between organic material, is 3,000 times more fracture resistant than a single crystal of the pure mineral4,5. The organic component, comprising just a few per cent of the composite by weight9, is thought to hold the key to nacre's fracture toughness10,11. Ceramics laminated with organic material are more fracture resistant than non-laminated ceramics11,12, but synthetic materials made of interlocking ceramic tablets bound by a few weight per cent of ordinary adhesives do not have a toughness comparable to nacre13. We believe that the key to nacre's fracture resistance resides in the polymer adhesive, and here we reveal the properties of this adhesive by using the atomic force microscope14 to stretch the organic molecules exposed on the surface of freshly cleaved nacre. The adhesive fibres elongate in a stepwise manner as folded domains or loops are pulled open. The elongation events occur for forces of a few hundred piconewtons, which are smaller than the forces of over a nanonewton required to break the polymer backbone in the threads. We suggest that this ‘modular’ elongation mechanism might prove to be quite general for conveying toughness to natural fibres and adhesives, and we predict that it might be found also in dragline silk.

/pdf/molecular-mechanistic-origin-of-the-toughness-of-natural-48qb7900gb.pdf

Molecular mechanistic origin of the toughness of natural adhesives, fibres and composites

The biological approach to forming crystals is proving to be most surprising. Mollusks build their shells by using a hydrophobic silk gel, very acidic aspartic acid rich proteins, and apparently also an amorphous precursor phase from which the crystals form. All this takes place in a highly structured chitinous framework. Here we present ideas on how these disparate components work together to produce the highly structured pearly nacreous layer of the mollusk shell.

/pdf/mollusk-shell-formation-a-source-of-new-concepts-for-4d1anmsagc.pdf

Mollusk shell formation: a source of new concepts for understanding biomineralization processes.

Biologically-formed hard tissues, referred to as biominerals, have intrigued the materials engineering community for years because of the high degree of crystallographic control that is exerted during the precipitation of the bioinorganic crystals. In recent years, there has been a shift in attention, from prior studies that focused on specific organic-inorganic interactions that modulate the crystal morphology via the conventional crystallization pathway, to recent studies that find that many biominerals are formed via an amorphous precursor pathway. It has become clear that the things we thought we had learned about biominerals before, may or may not be relevant to truly understanding the mechanisms involved in biomineralization. Having witnessed this paradigm shift first hand, I am inclined to provide a review from this historical perspective, where I hope to belay some ideas about where we were, where we are, and where we are going, with respect to understanding how these shells and other biominerals are formed. Therefore, one goal of this review is to try and provide a link between the prior literature and the new literature, which might be useful to newcomers in the field, whom I suspect may find it confusing and difficult to integrate the findings in these different types of studies across this time period. A second goal is to try and integrate some of the knowledge obtained from in vitro model systems, which can be more amenable to obtaining mechanistic information, with the in vivo and ex vivo observational studies on biominerals. A third goal is to demonstrate that there may be certain unifying principles found in biomineral systems that seem widely diverse, such as from diatoms, to mollusk shells, to vertebrate bones and teeth. A final goal (the not so hidden agenda), is to demonstrate that not only is there as strong likelihood that many biominerals are formed by an amorphous precursor, but that the amorphous phase may possess fluidic properties that impart new processing capabilities to the system. Of course those who know my work will readily assess that I am referring to the polymer-induced liquid-precursor (PILP) process, which has been a primary focus in my lab. Along these lines, some new hypotheses are presented regarding the morphogenesis of certain biominerals, such as mollusk nacre, kidney stones, and bones and teeth, along with a review of the literature that provides support to these new ideas. The intent is to stimulate thoughtful discussions in this rapidly emerging area, which seemingly provides a unifying principle in biomineralization.

1.1. Biomineral Overview
Biominerals that have intrigued the materials engineer for years. The diversity of biominerals became particularly evident by the variety of books on biominerals that emerged in the late 80’s to 90’s,1–11 which has continued with a few more recent additions to this nice collection.12–16 Many people are probably not even aware of the diversity of biologically formed minerals, so a sampling is provided in Table 1 to illustrate some of the different chemistries that evolved in the formation of various biological hard tissues. The calcium carbonate (CaCO3) biominerals of invertebrates, such as mollusk shells and sea urchin spines, have been particularly well studied due to their accessibility, and because of the high degree of crystallographic control that is achieved in these biologically formed crystals. The calcium phosphate (CaP) biominerals of the vertebrates, such as bones and teeth, have also been extensively investigated because of their remarkable structure and mechanical properties, and for the more obvious reasons of health related issues.14 Calcium oxalate (CaOx) biominerals can be found in plants, but the majority of studies have focused on the pathological form of CaOx that is found in kidney stones, which often occurs in conjunction with CaP deposits.8,14

Table 1

Examples of the diversity of biominerals. This list is by no means comprehensive, where some 70 different mineral phases have been identified to date.1–11

Biomimetic Model Systems for Investigating the Amorphous Precursor Pathway and Its Role in Biomineralization

We present experimental support for a model of abalone nacre growth that is based on mineral bridges between successive aragonite tablets rather than on heteroepitaxial nucleation. Interlamellar sheets of organic polymers delineate the aragonite tablets but allow the tablets to grow mineral bridges through pores in the sheets. Atomic force microscope images of interlamellar organic sheets from flat pearls made by Haliotis rufescens (red abalone; marine gastropod mollusk) reveal a fibrous core and holes of 5−50 nm in diameter. Scanning ion conductance microscopy shows that these holes are actually pores through the interlamellar sheets. With the help of statistical analysis we can associate the pore-to-pore spacings in the interlamellar sheets with the observed offsets of successive nacre tablets. These results, supplemented by AFM, SEM, and TEM images, support and extend the model of biofabrication of gastropod nacre which is based on mineral bridges between the aragonite tablets.

/pdf/does-abalone-nacre-form-by-heteroepitaxial-nucleation-or-by-329q6ri22t.pdf

Cristian Ionescu-Zanetti

Papers

Does Abalone Nacre Form by Heteroepitaxial Nucleation or by Growth through Mineral Bridges