Nuclear Data Sheets for A=132

Some errors were found in this review after it was published. Page 642, line 1: gSchmidt(πd3/2)=0.083 Page 642, paragraph 2.1.3, line 7 and line 12: gSchmidt = -1.913 should read μSchmidt = -1.913 Page 663, expression (4.7) should read: Figure 13 was incorrectly labelled. The correct figure is given below. Figure 13. (a) Zeeman splitting of the nuclear m-quantum levels due to interaction of the nuclear dipole moment (μ = gIμN) with a static magnetic field B. In a classical picture this can be seen as a precession of the spin I around B with a Larmor frequency νL. (b) Non-equidistant quadrupole splitting of the nuclear m-quantum levels due to interaction of the nuclear spectroscopic quadrupole moment Qs with an EFG Vzz. Page 673, expression (5.8) should read:

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0034-4885/66/4/205/pdf

Nuclear magnetic and quadrupole moments for nuclear structure research on exotic nuclei

Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 206

Nucleon-pair approximation to the nuclear shell model

Magnetic moments of N = 50 isotones and proton core polarization

Perturbed angular distribution methods (PAD) following nuclear reactions were applied to relaxation phenomena of excited nuclear states in liquid Ga, In, InGa alloys, Te, Hg, Tl, and Pb. Due to the selection of excited states with small g-factors the quadrupole relaxation rate τQ-1 in these metals, except in Tl, could be observed as the dominant contribution to the total rate at lower temperatures. It is suggested that the τQ-1 rates in Ga, In, InGa and Hg are essentially due to the diffusion induced mechanism while the interpretation of τQ-1 in Pb and Te is more complicated. Further magnetic relaxation rates of isolated impurities are deduced for four systems and quadrupole moments of ms-states in 71Ge, 115Sn, 205Pb, and 206Pb are derived from the quadrupole relaxation rates.

D Riegel

Papers

Relaxation Rates of Excited Nuclei in Liquid Metals