D
D. Van Norren
Researcher at Utrecht University
Publications - 53
Citations - 1880
D. Van Norren is an academic researcher from Utrecht University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Visual acuity & Retina. The author has an hindex of 23, co-authored 53 publications receiving 1805 citations. Previous affiliations of D. Van Norren include Maastricht University & University Medical Center Utrecht.
Papers
More filters
Journal Article
Influence of lutein supplementation on macular pigment, assessed with two objective techniques.
Tos T. J. M. Berendschot,R.A. Goldbohm,W.A.A. Klöpping,J. Van De Kraats,J. van Norel,D. Van Norren +5 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the extent of changes in the macular pigment density as a consequence of oral supplementation with lutein was determined by comparing two objective measurement techniques: reflectance maps and spectral fundus reflectance of the fovea.
Journal ArticleDOI
Spectral reflectance of the human eye.
D. Van Norren,L.F. Tiemeijer +1 more
TL;DR: Spectral reflectance of the eye was assessed in four young Caucasian subjects with the Utrecht densitometer and a good fit to the data was obtained and the calculated densities of the ocular pigments came close to data found in the literature.
Journal Article
Ultraviolet and green light cause different types of damage in rat retina.
TL;DR: In this paper, the influence of wavelength on retinal light damage in rat with funduscopy and histology and to determine a detailed action spectrum was assessed. But the results were limited to the range of 320 to 600 nm using a Tenon arc and Maxwellian view.
Journal ArticleDOI
Endoillumination during vitrectomy and phototoxicity thresholds.
TL;DR: Commercially available light sources for endoillumination during vitrectomy are not safe with respect to photochemical retinal damage, and even with maximal precautions macular phototoxic damage remains a factual danger during vit rectomy.
Journal Article
Density of foveal cone pigments at older age.
TL;DR: It is argued that a reduction in the number of cones with age, rather than an increase in ocular stray light is the most likely explanation of the findings.