D
danah boyd
Researcher at Microsoft
Publications - 154
Citations - 47684
danah boyd is an academic researcher from Microsoft. The author has contributed to research in topics: Social media & The Internet. The author has an hindex of 57, co-authored 154 publications receiving 43852 citations. Previous affiliations of danah boyd include University of New South Wales & New York University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship
danah boyd,Nicole B. Ellison +1 more
TL;DR: This publication contains reprint articles for which IEEE does not hold copyright and which are likely to be copyrighted.
Journal ArticleDOI
Critical questions for big data
danah boyd,Kate Crawford +1 more
TL;DR: The era of Big Data has begun as discussed by the authors, where diverse groups argue about the potential benefits and costs of analyzing genetic sequences, social media interactions, health records, phone logs, government records, and other digital traces left by people.
Journal ArticleDOI
I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience
Alice E. Marwick,danah boyd +1 more
TL;DR: This article investigates how content producers navigate ‘imagined audiences’ on Twitter, talking with participants who have different types of followings to understand their techniques, including targeting different audiences, concealing subjects, and maintaining authenticity.
Posted Content
Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life
TL;DR: This article examined American youth engagement in networked publics and considered how properties unique to such mediated environments (e.g., persistence, searchability, replicability, and invisible audiences) affect the ways in which youth interact with one another.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter
TL;DR: This paper examines the practice of retweeting as a way by which participants can be "in a conversation" and highlights how authorship, attribution, and communicative fidelity are negotiated in diverse ways.