scispace - formally typeset
D

Daniel Axelrod

Researcher at McMaster University

Publications -  44
Citations -  305

Daniel Axelrod is an academic researcher from McMaster University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Randomized controlled trial. The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 37 publications receiving 111 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Total Hip Arthroplasty Versus Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

TL;DR: The best evidence showed that hemiarthroplasty and THA likely result in similar revision rate, function, mortality, periprosthetic fracture, and dislocation at up to 5 years, with a small, possibly unimportant benefit in health-related quality of life with THA.
Journal ArticleDOI

What Is the Best Evidence for Management of Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of 22 Randomized Controlled Trials.

TL;DR: Surgical treatment led to a greater likelihood of union at 1 year of follow-up among adult patients with displaced mid-third clavicle fractures and outperformed nonoperative treatment with minor improvements in DASH and Constant scores, though not approaching the MCID.
Journal ArticleDOI

What Is the Relative Effectiveness of the Various Surgical Treatment Options for Distal Radius Fractures? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

TL;DR: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on DRF treatment found no clinically important differences in terms of the DASH score at 1 year; although differences were found, all were less than the MCID of 10 points.
Journal ArticleDOI

Reporting Outcomes and Outcome Measures in Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.

TL;DR: There is a lack of consensus on critical outcomes after surgery for thumb CMC joint OA, and a standardized COS created by stakeholder consensus would improve the consistency and therefore the quality of future research.