scispace - formally typeset
D

Daniel B. Fambro

Researcher at Texas A&M University

Publications -  49
Citations -  1707

Daniel B. Fambro is an academic researcher from Texas A&M University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Stopping sight distance & Poison control. The author has an hindex of 20, co-authored 49 publications receiving 1533 citations. Previous affiliations of Daniel B. Fambro include Texas A&M University System.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Application of Subset Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average Model for Short-Term Freeway Traffic Volume Forecasting

TL;DR: It is believed that the use of a subset ARIMA model could increase the accuracy of the short-term forecasting task within time-series models.
Journal Article

Determination of stopping sight distances

TL;DR: In this article, the authors describe the development of recommended revisions to the stopping sight distance (SSD) design policy that appears in portions of Chapters II and III of the 1994 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) publication, "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets" (referred to as the Green Book).
Journal ArticleDOI

Predicting Operating Speeds on Tangent Sections of Two-Lane Rural Highways:

TL;DR: Research analyzed the variability of the operating speeds on 162 tangent sections of two-lane rural highways, and models were developed for prediction of operating speed based on the geometric characteristics available.
Journal Article

Model to evaluate the impacts of bus priority on signalized intersections

TL;DR: The development of a model to evaluate the impacts and the feasibility of implementing a priority strategy at signalized intersections and it seems to be predicting delay reasonably accurately, however, in some cases the model was overestimating delay.
Journal ArticleDOI

Driver Perception-Brake Response in Stopping Sight Distance Situations

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors measured driver perception-brake response to several different stopping sight distance situations and found that the 95th percentile perception braking response times for these same conditions were 2.0 s.