D
Daniel D. Frey
Researcher at Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Publications - 96
Citations - 5007
Daniel D. Frey is an academic researcher from Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Engineering design process & Systems design. The author has an hindex of 22, co-authored 95 publications receiving 4536 citations. Previous affiliations of Daniel D. Frey include Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering & Western Atlas.
Papers
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI
How One-Factor-at-a-Time Experimentation Can Lead to Greater Improvements Than Orthogonal Arrays
Daniel D. Frey,Rajesh Jugulum +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the main effects and interactions of the experimental factors are presented and analyzed to explain the observed simulation results, showing that one-at-a-time designs consistently exploit interactions despite the fact that these designs lack the resolution to estimate interactions.
Journal ArticleDOI
Compound Noise: Evaluation as a Robust Design Method
TL;DR: It is found that the compound noise strategy is very effective for systems which exhibit effect sparsity, and the alternative method requires less information to formulate compound noise as compared to Taguchi's formulation.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
A hybrid magnetic field model for axisymmetric magnets
TL;DR: A hybrid model, synergistically fusing the accuracy of artificial neutral networks (ANNs) and the efficiency of the single magnetic dipole (MD) model, is presented to characterize the magnetic field of axisymmetric cylindrical permanent magnets.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Stochastic failure model for endurance degradation in vacancy modulated HfO x RRAM using the percolation cell framework
TL;DR: In this paper, a generic statistical model is proposed to simulate the endurance cycle distribution as a function of the pulse voltage, pulse duration, compliance level, activation energy, dielectric thickness, filament temperature and filament size / shape.
Book ChapterDOI
Advancing Design Research: A “Big-D” Design Perspective
TL;DR: This paper concludes by recommending aggressive attempts to arrive at a coherent set of terminology and research methodologies relative to design research that extend over at least all of technologically-enabled design and perform epistemological and ontological studies of the relationship of engineering science and technologically- enabled design science as there is more overlap between them than is generally recognized.