Daniel Loewe

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors critica-se neste artigo a tese da politica do reconhecimento, segunda a qual o auto-respeito dos individuos depende on reconheção geral da sua pertenca cultural.

TL;DR: Siguiendo una interpretación cosmopolita de la teoria de justicia de Rawls, this paper argued that the argumentos that Rawls articula tanto en su teoria of justicia domestica as well as en his teoria en relaciones internacionales contra the idea of la justicia global and contra un derecho a inmigracion no son convincentes, and una interpretation coherente de their teoria no se opone a a movimiento sin fronteras (MSF).

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors analyse the justifications of cultural rights within a liberal egalitarian framework that defines justice according to a conception of equal opportunities and show that this sort of justification is not possible in the context of Rawls' and Dworkins' theories.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that the most important arguments against a cosmopolitan right to immigrate aren't valid in the case of refugees, and they show that the rights of refugees must be understood more extensive than it is actually the case.

TL;DR: The authors criticizes traditional positions about the discretional competence of states regarding the access of immigrants, and asks whether the right for free mobility or obligations of global distributive justice follows from the standpoint of global justice.