To estimate the effect of delay to surgery for hip fracture on 30-day mortality using a risk adjustment strategy to control for the effect of demographic and clinical confounders. This observational study was carried out on all patients admitted with a hip fracture and discharged between January 2004 and December 2007 from a teaching hospital. Gender, age, time to surgery, mortality and medical comorbidities were derived from hospital discharge records (SDO), while International Normalised Ratio (INR) and American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score were retrieved from clinical records. Backward stepwise logistic regression was used to identify potential confounders in the relationship between time to surgery and mortality. A final multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out controlling for the effect of confounders. In the 1320 patients who underwent surgery (mean age = 83 years, % female = 76.8%), time to surgery was two days or less in 746 (56.5%) patients and 30-day mortality was 3.5%. The interventions included partial or total hip replacement (N=820, 62.1%) and reduction and internal fixation (N=500, 37.9%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that patients with a time to surgery greater than two days had a 2-fold increase in 30-day mortality after adjusting for age, gender, and comorbidity (OR=1.992, 95% CI 1.065-3.725). In a second model also including ASA score the odd ratio decreased to 1.839 (95% CI 0.971-3.486). Patients with a hip fracture should have surgery within two days from admission in order to reduce 30-day mortality.

/pdf/hip-fracture-effectiveness-of-early-surgery-to-prevent-30-1q6h1j02yp.pdf

Hip fracture: effectiveness of early surgery to prevent 30-day mortality

Background geriatric consultation teams have failed to impact clinical outcomes prompting geriatric co-management programmes to emerge as a promising strategy to manage frail patients on non-geriatric wards. Objective to conduct a systematic review of the effectiveness of in-hospital geriatric co-management. Data sources MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and CENTRAL were searched from inception to 6 May 2016. Reference lists, trial registers and PubMed Central Citations were additionally searched. Study selection randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies of in-hospital patients included in a geriatric co-management study. Two investigators performed the selection process independently. Data extraction standardised data extraction and assessment of risk of bias were performed independently by two investigators. Results twelve studies and 3,590 patients were included from six randomised and six quasi-experimental studies. Geriatric co-management improved functional status and reduced the number of patients with complications in three of the four studies, but studies had a high risk of bias and outcomes were measured heterogeneously and could not be pooled. Co-management reduced the length of stay (pooled mean difference, -1.88 days [95% CI, -2.44 to -1.33]; 11 studies) and may reduce in-hospital mortality (pooled odds ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.50-1.03]; 7 studies). Meta-analysis identified no effect on the number of patients discharged home (5 studies), post-discharge mortality (3 studies) and readmission rate (4 studies). Conclusions there was low-quality evidence of a reduced length of stay and a reduced number of patients with complications, and very low-quality evidence of better functional status as a result of geriatric co-management.

Effectiveness of in-hospital geriatric co-management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

We retrospectively reviewed 2989 consecutive
patients with a mean age of 81 (21 to 105) and a female to male
ratio of 5:2 who were admitted to our hip fracture unit between
July 2009 and February 2013. We compared weekday and weekend admission
and weekday and weekend surgery 30-day mortality rates for hip fractures
treated both surgically and conservatively. After adjusting for
confounders, weekend admission was independently and significantly
associated with a rise in 30-day mortality (odds ratio (OR) 1.4,
95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02 to 1.9; p = 0.039) for patients
undergoing hip fracture surgery. There was no increase in mortality
associated with weekend surgery (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.8 to 1.7; p =
0.39). All hip fracture patients, whether managed surgically or
conservatively, were more likely to die as an inpatient when admitted
at the weekend (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.80; p = 0.032), despite
our unit having a comparatively low overall inpatient mortality
(8.7%). Hip fracture patients admitted over the weekend appear to
have a greater risk of death despite having a consultant-led service. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:373–8.

The weekend effect: short-term mortality following admission with a hip fracture

Hip fractures are a very serious socio-economic problem in western countries. Since the 1950s, orthogeriatric units have introduced improvements in the care of geriatric patients admitted to hospital because of hip fractures. During this period, these units have reduced mean hospital stays, number of complications, and both in-hospital mortality and mortality over the middle term after hospital discharge, along with improvements in the quality of care and a reduction in costs. Likewise, a recent clinical trial has reported greater functional gains among the affected patients. Studies in this field have identified the prognostic factors present upon admission or manifesting themselves during admission and that increase the risk of patient mortality or disability. In addition, improved care afforded by orthogeriatric units has proved to reduce costs. Nevertheless, a number of management issues remain to be clarified, such as the optimum anesthetic, analgesic, and thromboprophylactic protocols; the type of diagnostic and therapeutic approach best suited to patients with cognitive problems; or the efficiency of the programs used in convalescence units or in home rehabilitation care. Randomized clinical trials are needed to consolidate the evidence in this regard.

/pdf/orthogeriatric-care-improving-patient-outcomes-2p52e2rvwo.pdf

Orthogeriatric care: improving patient outcomes.

Background our orthopaedic trauma unit serves a large elderly population, admitting 400-500 hip fractures annually. A higher than expected mortality was detected amongst these patients, prompting a change in the hip fracture pathway. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a change in orthogeriatric provision on hip fracture outcomes and care quality indicators. Patients and Methods the hip fracture pathway was changed from a geriatric consultation service to a completely integrated service on a dedicated orthogeriatric ward. A total of 1,894 consecutive patients with hip fractures treated in the 2 years before and after this intervention were analysed. Results despite an increase in case complexity, the intervention resulted in a significant reduction in mean length of stay from 27.5 to 21 days (P < 0.001), a significant reduction in mean time to surgery from 41.8 to 27.2 h (P < 0.001) and a significant 22% reduction in 30-day mortality (13.2-10.3%, P = 0.04). After controlling for the effects of age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) Grade and abbreviated mental test score (AMTS), the effect of integrating orthogeriatric services into the hip fracture pathway significantly reduced the risk of mortality (odds ratio 0.68, P = 0.03). Conclusions changing our hip fracture service from a geriatric consultation model of care to an integrated orthogeriatric model significantly improved mortality and performance indicators. This is the first study to directly compare two accepted models of orthogeriatric care in the same hospital.

/pdf/improving-hip-fracture-outcomes-with-integrated-lfqz70he6s.pdf

Improving hip fracture outcomes with integrated orthogeriatric care: a comparison between two accepted orthogeriatric models

Most health services in the United Kingdom provide unacceptable in-hospital care for hip fracture patients. We describe the impact on surgical delay following the introduction of an orthogeriatrician and the addition of one extra trauma list per week at our centre. Prospective data were collected on 101 consecutive patients followed by a second cohort of 105 patients. Mean time to surgery in cohorts 1 and 2 was 4.08 and 4.05 days, respectively (p = 0.71). Diagnosis of medical comorbidity increased with input from the orthogeriatrician from 69.7% to 74.2% (p = 0.24). Length of stay and mortality were comparable in the two groups. A full trauma list accounted for the most frequent orthopaedic delay, which decreased from 18.1% to 12.9% (p = 0.09). Increased recognition of medical comorbidity has financial implications for hospital remuneration. However, lack of orthopaedic provisions accounts for significant avoidable surgical delay requiring further investment if national standards are to be achieved.

Daniel Marsland

Papers

Prospective study of surgical delay for hip fractures: impact of an orthogeriatrician and increased trauma capacity