scispace - formally typeset
D

Danielle Whicher

Researcher at Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Publications -  26
Citations -  973

Danielle Whicher is an academic researcher from Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. The author has contributed to research in topics: Comparative effectiveness research & Health care. The author has an hindex of 15, co-authored 25 publications receiving 881 citations. Previous affiliations of Danielle Whicher include University of Toronto & Johns Hopkins University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Rethinking Randomized Clinical Trials for Comparative Effectiveness Research: The Need for Transformational Change

TL;DR: This article addresses several fundamental limitations of traditional RCTs for meeting CER objectives and offers 3 potentially transformational approaches to enhance their operational efficiency, analytical efficiency, and generalizability for CER.
Journal ArticleDOI

The role for pragmatic randomized controlled trials (pRCTs) in comparative effectiveness research

TL;DR: While the level of interest and activity in conducting pRCTs is increasing, many challenges remain for their routine use and some potential ways forward are offered.
Journal ArticleDOI

Ethics and informed consent for comparative effectiveness research with prospective electronic clinical data.

TL;DR: A CER-ECD observational study that imposes no or minimal additional risk to or burden on patients may proceed ethically without express informed consent from participants in settings where: patients are regularly informed of the health care institution’s commitment to learning through the integration of research and practice and there are appropriate protections for patients’ rights and interests.
Journal ArticleDOI

An overview of the impact of rare disease characteristics on research methodology.

TL;DR: A landscape review of available methodological and analytic approaches to address the challenges of rare disease research suggests that use of a broader array of methodological approaches to RCTs --such as adaptive trials, cross-over trials, and early escape designs can improve the productivity of robust research in rare diseases.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparative effectiveness research priorities: identifying critical gaps in evidence for clinical and health policy decision making.

TL;DR: This study describes an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality-funded pilot project to translate one current comparative effectiveness review into a prioritized list of evidence gaps and research questions reflecting the views of the healthcare decision makers involved in the pilot.