D
David Annandale
Researcher at Murdoch University
Publications - 27
Citations - 2242
David Annandale is an academic researcher from Murdoch University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Sustainability & Sustainability organizations. The author has an hindex of 13, co-authored 27 publications receiving 2136 citations.
Papers
More filters
Book Chapter
Conceptualising sustainability assessment
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compare TBL approaches and principles-based approaches to developing such sustainability criteria, concluding that the latter are more appropriate, since they avoid many of the inherent limitations of the triple-bottom-line as a conception of sustainability.
Journal ArticleDOI
Conceptualising sustainability assessment
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present an alternative notion of sustainability assessment, with the more ambitious aim of seeking to determine whether or not an initiative is actually sustainable, and compare TBL approaches and principles-based approaches to developing such sustainability criteria, concluding that the latter are more appropriate, since they avoid many of the inherent limitations of the triple-bottom-line as a conception of sustainability.
Journal ArticleDOI
The impact of voluntary environmental protection instruments on company environmental performance
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present the findings of a survey of 40 companies operating in Western Australia to determine the extent to which the implementation of two voluntary environmental protection tools has influenced company environmental performance.
Journal ArticleDOI
Developing and evaluating environmental impact assessment systems for small developing countries
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors categorize and review different approaches to environmental impact assessment (EIA) system evaluation, and describe the application of Wood's (1995) "ideal" EIA system evaluation criteria to the Republic of Maldives.
Journal ArticleDOI
Practitioner perspectives on what influences EIA quality
TL;DR: The pressure on proponents to produce good quality environmental impact statements (EIS) and the expectations of EIA regulators are investigated, highlighting the value of public involvement in EIA and in having clear and accountable procedures.