D
David Grant
Researcher at University of Melbourne
Publications - 105
Citations - 6426
David Grant is an academic researcher from University of Melbourne. The author has contributed to research in topics: Organizational studies & Organizational learning. The author has an hindex of 38, co-authored 104 publications receiving 6111 citations. Previous affiliations of David Grant include Griffith University & University of New South Wales.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Discourse and Collaboration: The Role of Conversations and Collective Identity
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explore the relationship between discourse and interorganizational collaboration and argue that effective collaboration can be understood as the product of sets of conversations that draw on existing discourses.
Book
The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Discourse
TL;DR: The importance of researcher context Discourse, Power and Ideology - Dennis K Mumby Unpacking the Critical Approach Deconstructing Discourse - Martin Kilduff and Mihaela Kelemen.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Social Construction of Leadership: A Sailing Guide
Gail T. Fairhurst,David Grant +1 more
TL;DR: A growing body of literature now exists concerning the social construction of leadership as discussed by the authors, which draws on a variety of definitions of social constructionism, multiple constructs, and an array of perspectives, approaches, and methods.
Journal ArticleDOI
Organizational Discourse: Key Contributions and Challenges
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors highlight the increasing significance of organizational discourse as a field of inquiry and identify several ways in which organizational discourse contributes to the study and understanding of organizations, and also identify a number of challenges faced by organizational discourse advocates, suggesting that in some cases they are not insurmountable while in others they are unwarranted.
Journal ArticleDOI
Metaphor and analogical reasoning in organization theory: beyond orthodoxy
TL;DR: This paper argued that metaphors operate within the "cognitive comfort zone" of similarity, and analogically, they are best seen as a means of elaborating and explicating existing knowledge, and made the case for greater analytical attention to be paid to the so-called lesser tropes of anomaly, paradox, and irony, which are based on dissimilarity.