scispace - formally typeset
D

Dawn R. Elm

Researcher at University of St. Thomas (Minnesota)

Publications -  23
Citations -  962

Dawn R. Elm is an academic researcher from University of St. Thomas (Minnesota). The author has contributed to research in topics: Moral reasoning & Ethical decision. The author has an hindex of 10, co-authored 23 publications receiving 904 citations. Previous affiliations of Dawn R. Elm include University of Minnesota & Marquette University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

An investigation of the moral reasoning of managers

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined factors which could influence the moral reasoning of managers at work and found that neither perceived ethical climate nor self-monitoring are related to managers' moral reasoning.
Journal ArticleDOI

Moral Reasoning in Groups: Leaders Make a Difference

TL;DR: In this paper, a program of research on how groups reason about moral dilemmas, and presents data from two studies, is presented, where discussions of 21 four-member groups were tape recorded, coded, and analyzed to identify the factors that affected group performance.
Journal ArticleDOI

Measuring moral judgment: The Moral Judgment Interview or the Defining Issues Test?

TL;DR: In this article, the authors compare and contrast two distinct techniques for measuring moral judgment: the Moral Judgment Interview and the Defining Issues Test and discuss the theoretical foundations, accompanying advantages and limitations, as well as appropriate usage of these methodologies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Innovation in manufacturing

TL;DR: In this article, a group of 65 manufacturing managers (vice-presidents, plant managers and manufacturing directors) were brought together and divided into seven small groups, each of which had direct responsibility for from one to five manufacturing plants of various sizes.

The Effect of Context on Moral Intensity of Ethical Issues: Revising Jones's

TL;DR: In this paper, the effect of context on the moral intensity of ethical issues through a phenomenolog- ical study was examined and it was shown that context may be critical in affecting the moral intent and behavior of an actor.