scispace - formally typeset
D

Denise F. Polit

Researcher at Griffith University

Publications -  45
Citations -  24629

Denise F. Polit is an academic researcher from Griffith University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Nursing research & Qualitative research. The author has an hindex of 30, co-authored 45 publications receiving 22383 citations.

Papers
More filters
Book

Nursing Research - Generating And Assessing Evidence For Nursing Practice

TL;DR: In this article, the authors introduce the concept of evidence-based research in the context of qualitative and quantitative research, and propose a methodology to generate evidence for nursing research in an Evidence-Based Practice Environment.
Journal ArticleDOI

The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? critique and recommendations

TL;DR: It is found that both methods of computing the scale-level index (S-CVI) are being used by nurse researchers, although it was not always possible to infer the calculation method.
Book

Resource Manual for Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice

TL;DR: The perfect complement to Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice, Ninth Edition, this knowledge builder helps you develop and reinforce basic skills essential to nursing research.
Book

Essentials of nursing research: Methods, appraisal, and utilization

TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide an overview of the research process in qualitative and quantitative research and its use in nursing practice, including preliminary steps in the Research Process Scrutinizing Research Problems, Research Questions, and Hypotheses Finding and Reviewing Studies in the Literature Examining the Conceptual/Theoretical Basis of a Study Part I: Overview of Nursing Research Introducing Research and Its Use in Nursing Practice Comprehending Key Concepts in Qualitative and Quantitative Research Understanding the Research process in QualIT Understanding the research processes in Q&Q Understanding Q&
Journal ArticleDOI

Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations

TL;DR: In this article, the authors compared the CVI to alternative content validity indexes and concluded that the widely-used CVI has advantages with regard to ease of computation, understandability, focus on agreement of relevance rather than agreement per se, and focus on consensus rather than consistency, and provision of both item and scale information.