scispace - formally typeset
D

Diana Hilda Hohl

Researcher at Free University of Berlin

Publications -  16
Citations -  392

Diana Hilda Hohl is an academic researcher from Free University of Berlin. The author has contributed to research in topics: Social support & Context (language use). The author has an hindex of 7, co-authored 16 publications receiving 289 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Effects of dyadic planning on physical activity in couples: A randomized controlled trial.

TL;DR: Adding relationship quality to the equation clarified effects of DPC and IPC on physical activity and revealed the complexity of effects of dyadic planning on behavior change.
Journal ArticleDOI

Which characteristics of planning matter? Individual and dyadic physical activity plans and their effects on plan enactment.

TL;DR: Linking health behaviours to other behavioural routines seems beneficial for subsequent plan enactment, as mechanisms underlying this effect remain unclear, and they should be investigated further.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sedentary behaviours and health-related quality of life. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

TL;DR: Moderator analyses indicated that associations between the physical HRQOL domain and sedentary behaviours may be similar in strength across age- and health status groups, but not reliably to mental and socialHRQOL.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sedentary behaviors and anxiety among children, adolescents and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

TL;DR: Further longitudinal studies are necessary to elucidate the predictive direction of the anxiety—SB relationship and to clarify whether the effects depend on the type of anxiety indicators.
Journal ArticleDOI

Enabling or Cultivating? The Role of Prostate Cancer Patients' Received Partner Support and Self-Efficacy in the Maintenance of Pelvic Floor Exercise Following Tumor Surgery

TL;DR: Patients’ self-efficacy may cultivate partners’ support provision for patients’ PFE, whereas evidence of an enabling function of support as a predictor of self- efficacy was inconsistent.