SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) is a comprehensive, semi-distributed river basin model that requires a large number of input parameters, which complicates model parameterization and calibration. Several calibration techniques have been developed for SWAT, including manual calibration procedures and automated procedures using the shuffled complex evolution method and other common methods. In addition, SWAT-CUP was recently developed and provides a decision-making framework that incorporates a semi-automated approach (SUFI2) using both manual and automated calibration and incorporating sensitivity and uncertainty analysis. In SWAT-CUP, users can manually adjust parameters and ranges iteratively between autocalibration runs. Parameter sensitivity analysis helps focus the calibration and uncertainty analysis and is used to provide statistics for goodness-of-fit. The user interaction or manual component of the SWAT-CUP calibration forces the user to obtain a better understanding of the overall hydrologic processes (e.g., baseflow ratios, ET, sediment sources and sinks, crop yields, and nutrient balances) and of parameter sensitivity. It is important for future calibration developments to spatially account for hydrologic processes; improve model run time efficiency; include the impact of uncertainty in the conceptual model, model parameters, and measured variables used in calibration; and assist users in checking for model errors. When calibrating a physically based model like SWAT, it is important to remember that all model input parameters must be kept within a realistic uncertainty range and that no automatic procedure can substitute for actual physical knowledge of the watershed.

/pdf/swat-model-use-calibration-and-validation-3yiyw8b1pn.pdf

SWAT: Model Use, Calibration, and Validation

The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model has emerged as one of the most widely used water quality watershed- and river basin-scale models worldwide, applied extensively for a broad range of hydrologic and/or environmental problems. The international use of SWAT can be attributed to its flexibility in addressing water resource problems, extensive networking via dozens of training workshops and the several international conferences that have been held during the past decade, comprehensive online documentation and supporting software, and an open source code that can be adapted by model users for specific application needs. The catalyst for this special collection of papers was the 2011 International SWAT Conference & Workshops held in Toledo, Spain, which featured over 160 scientific presentations representing SWAT applications in 37 countries. This special collection presents 22 specific SWAT-related studies, most of which were presented at the 2011 SWAT Conference; it represents SWAT applications on five different continents, with the majority of studies being conducted in Europe and North America. The papers cover a variety of topics, including hydrologic testing at a wide range of watershed scales, transport of pollutants in northern European lowland watersheds, data input and routing method effects on sediment transport, development and testing of potential new model algorithms, and description and testing of supporting software. In this introduction to the special section, we provide a synthesis of these studies within four main categories: (i) hydrologic foundations, (ii) sediment transport and routing analyses, (iii) nutrient and pesticide transport, and (iv) scenario analyses. We conclude with a brief summary of key SWAT research and development needs.

Applications of the SWAT Model Special Section: Overview and Insights.

Obtaining representative meteorological data for watershed-scale hydrological modelling can be difficult and time consuming. Land-based weather stations do not always adequately represent the weather occurring over a watershed, because they can be far from the watershed of interest and can have gaps in their data series, or recent data are not available. This study presents a method for using the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) global meteorological dataset to obtain historical weather data and demonstrates the application to modelling five watersheds representing different hydroclimate regimes. CFSR data are available globally for each hour since 1979 at a 38-km resolution. Results show that utilizing the CFSR precipitation and temperature data to force a watershed model provides stream discharge simulations that are as good as or better than models forced using traditional weather gauging stations, especially when stations are more than 10 km from the watershed. These results further demonstrate that adding CFSR data to the suite of watershed modelling tools provides new opportunities for meeting the challenges of modelling un-gauged watersheds and advancing real-time hydrological modelling. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

https://globalweather.tamu.edu/content/docs/Fuka-Using-CFSR-dataset-to-improve-weather-input-data.pdf

Using the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis as weather input data for watershed models

Implementation of sensitivity analysis (SA) procedures is helpful in calibration of models and also for their transposition to different watersheds. The reported studies on SA of Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model were mostly focused on identifying parameters for pruning or modifying during the calibration process. This paper presents a sensitivity and identifiability analysis of model parameters that influence stream flow generation in SWAT. The analysis was focused on evaluating the sensitivity of the parameters in different climatic settings, temporal scales and flow regimes. The global sensitivity analysis (GSA) technique based on classical decomposition of variance, Sobol', was employed in this study. The results of the study indicate that modeled stream flow show varying sensitivity to parameters in different climatic settings. The results also suggest that the identifiability of a parameter for a given watershed is a major concern in calibrating the model for the specific watershed, as it might lead to equifinality of parameters. The SWAT model parameters show varying sensitivity in different years of simulation suggesting the requirement for dynamic updation of parameters during the simulation. The sensitivity of parameters during various flow regimes (low, medium and high flow) is also found to be uneven, which suggests the significance of a multi-criteria approach for the calibration of models. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Sensitivity and identifiability of stream flow generation parameters of the SWAT model

. A multi basin analysis of runoff and erosion in the Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia was conducted to elucidate sources of runoff and sediment. Erosion is arguably the most critical problem in the Blue Nile Basin, as it limits agricultural productivity in Ethiopia, degrades benthos in the Nile, and results in sedimentation of dams in downstream countries. A modified version of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model was developed to predict runoff and sediment losses from the Ethiopian Blue Nile Basin. The model simulates saturation excess runoff from the landscape using a simple daily water balance coupled to a topographic wetness index in ways that are consistent with observed runoff processes in the basin. The spatial distribution of landscape erosion is thus simulated more correctly. The model was parameterized in a nested design for flow at eight and sediment at three locations in the basin. Subbasins ranged in size from 1.3 to 174 000 km2, and interestingly, the partitioning of runoff and infiltrating flow could be predicted by topographic information. Model predictions showed reasonable accuracy (Nash Sutcliffe Efficiencies ranged from 0.53–0.92) with measured data across all sites except Kessie, where the water budget could not be closed; however, the timing of flow was well captured. Runoff losses increased with rainfall during the monsoonal season and were greatest from areas with shallow soils and large contributing areas. Analysis of model results indicate that upland landscape erosion dominated sediment delivery to the main stem of the Blue Nile in the early part of the growing season when tillage occurs and before the soil was wetted up and plant cover was established. Once plant cover was established in mid August landscape erosion was negligible and sediment export was dominated by channel processes and re-suspension of landscape sediment deposited early in the growing season. These results imply that targeting small areas of the landscape where runoff is produced can be the most effective at controlling erosion and protecting water resources. However, it is not clear what can be done to manage channel erosion, particularly in first order streams in the basin.

/pdf/a-multi-basin-swat-model-analysis-of-runoff-and-3ypo5rom4x.pdf

A multi basin SWAT model analysis of runoff and sedimentation in the Blue Nile, Ethiopia

http://www.hydrology.bee.cornell.edu/Papers/EastonJHYDROL08.pdf

Re-conceptualizing the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) model to predict runoff from variable source areas

In this study, two different versions of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) are used to simulate the Cannonsville Watershed. These versions are referred to as SWAT_TS and SWAT_VSA. The SWAT-VSA model distributes overland flow in ways that are consistent with variable source area hydrology, while the SWAT_TS model does not. Since many water quality models, such as SWAT, use some form of the curve number equation to predict storm runoff, these models may fail to accurately describe the effects of variable source areas (VSAs), which are mostly important in rural, humid areas, such as upstate New York. These two models are compared by calibrating each for flow, phosphorous and sediment against measured data.

/pdf/a-comparison-of-a-swat-model-for-the-cannonsville-watershed-4evl3ztqla.pdf

A Comparison of a SWAT Model for the Cannonsville Watershed with and without Variable Source Area Hydrology

Assessing best management practice (BMP) effectiveness in large basins is complicated by hydrologic variability, ecosystem complexity, and issues of scaling. A traditional approach to assessing BMP effectiveness in large watersheds is to forecast several BMP scenarios and compare their performance relative to a baseline scenario. While this approach may provide insight into the effectiveness of future BMP scenarios, it does not quantify the impact of BMPs that have already been implemented. The authors propose that a continuous water quality model may be used as a pseudo-control watershed in order to determine BMP effectiveness in large catchments. Preliminary results using this approach suggest that agricultural BMPs have reduced dissolved phosphorus loads to the Cannonsville Reservoir in Upstate New York. Future work will involve the implementation of sophisticated analyses to confirm the statistical significance of reductions in dissolved phosphorus loads to the reservoir.

/pdf/assessing-phosphorus-bmp-effectiveness-in-the-cannonsville-1w22nrrxbq.pdf

Dillon M. Cowan

Papers

Re-conceptualizing the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) model to predict runoff from variable source areas

A Comparison of a SWAT Model for the Cannonsville Watershed with and without Variable Source Area Hydrology

Assessing Phosphorus BMP Effectiveness in the Cannonsville Watershed Using SWAT2000