scispace - formally typeset
D

Domenico Giulini

Researcher at Leibniz University of Hanover

Publications -  149
Citations -  5825

Domenico Giulini is an academic researcher from Leibniz University of Hanover. The author has contributed to research in topics: General relativity & Einstein. The author has an hindex of 31, co-authored 145 publications receiving 5452 citations. Previous affiliations of Domenico Giulini include Pennsylvania State University & University of Freiburg.

Papers
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

Instants in Physics: Point Mechanics and General Relativity

TL;DR: In this paper, the difference between relationalism in point mechanics and field theory and the problematic foundational dependencies between fields and spacetime is discussed. But, the main difference is that point mechanics usually do not address "the present" or "the now".
Journal ArticleDOI

A Euclidean Bianchi model based on S3D8

TL;DR: In this paper, the round four-sphere can be sliced along homogeneous 3-manifolds of topology S 3 D 8 ∗, which defines a Euclidean Bianchi type IX model for Einstein's equations with cosmological constant.
Journal ArticleDOI

Asymptotic symmetries of scalar electrodynamics and of the abelian Higgs model in Hamiltonian formulation

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated the asymptotic symmetry group of a scalar field minimally coupled to an abelian gauge field using the Hamiltonian formulation and showed that the symmetries reduce to the Poincare group in an unproblematic fashion.
Posted Content

Decoherence: A dynamical approach to superselection rules?

TL;DR: In this article, a detailed and somewhat pedagogical exposition of the basic structural properties of the spaces of states and observables in order to establish a fairly precise notion of superselection rules is given.
Journal Article

States, symmetries and superselection

TL;DR: In this article, the Bargmann superselection rule and charge superselection rules in quantum electrodynamics were investigated and it was shown that the kinematical arguments usually given are not physically convincing unless they are based on an underlying dynamical process.