D
Dominic Furniss
Researcher at University College London
Publications - 96
Citations - 1848
Dominic Furniss is an academic researcher from University College London. The author has contributed to research in topics: Health care & Resilience (network). The author has an hindex of 21, co-authored 95 publications receiving 1542 citations. Previous affiliations of Dominic Furniss include Wigan.
Papers
More filters
Book
Qualitative HCI Research: Going Behind the Scenes
TL;DR: This lecture draws on the analogy of making a documentary film, and presents a repertoire of techniques for understanding user needs, practices and experiences with technology, including practical considerations such as tactics for recruiting participants when aiming for a particular sampling strategy, and ways of getting started when faced with a pile of interview transcripts.
Journal ArticleDOI
Understanding emergency medical dispatch in terms of distributed cognition: a case study.
Dominic Furniss,Ann Blandford +1 more
TL;DR: A method for constructing a DC account of team working in the domain of EMD is developed, focusing on the use of the method for describing an existing EMD work system, identifying sources of weakness in that system, and reasoning about the likely consequences of redesign of the system.
Journal Article
DiCoT: A methodology for applying Distributed Cognition to the design of teamworking systems
Ann Blandford,Dominic Furniss +1 more
TL;DR: The DiCoT (Distributed Cognition for Teamwork) system as mentioned in this paper is a methodology and representational system developed to support distributed cognition analysis of small team working in ambulance control centres.
Journal ArticleDOI
A resilience markers framework for small teams
TL;DR: The framework presented here provides the basis for developing concrete measures for improving the resilience of organisations through training, system design, and organisational learning.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Confessions from a grounded theory PhD: experiences and lessons learnt
TL;DR: An extended GT study on understanding why practitioners choose particular usability evaluation methods is described, and seven practical and methodological considerations in applying GT in a CHI context are drawn out.