E
Eddy Van Avermaet
Researcher at Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Publications - 17
Citations - 457
Eddy Van Avermaet is an academic researcher from Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. The author has contributed to research in topics: Minority influence & Ethnocentrism. The author has an hindex of 9, co-authored 17 publications receiving 446 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Do not prime hawks with doves: the interplay of construct activation and consistency of social value orientation on cooperative behavior.
TL;DR: Low and high consistent pro-socials and pro-selfs were primed with neutral, morality, or might concepts in mixed-motive situations to influence cooperative behavior among participants' social value orientation and the primes influenced cooperative behavior more among low than high consistent individuals.
Journal ArticleDOI
Majority influence, minority influence and conversion behavior: A replication
Machteld Doms,Eddy Van Avermaet +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, a replication and extension of Moscovici and Personnaz's experiment was performed and it was found that both a majority and a minority produced conversion behavior, while no evidence of compliance in any social influence condition.
Journal ArticleDOI
Politics and Basking-in-Reflected-Glory: A Field Study in Flanders
Filip Boen,Norbert Vanbeselaere,Mario Pandelaere,Siegfried Dewitte,Bart Duriez,Boris Snauwaert,Jos Feys,Vicky Dierckx,Eddy Van Avermaet +8 more
TL;DR: In this article, a field study tested whether the basking-in-reflected-glory phenomenon would emerge in a political context and found a strongly positive linear relation between proportional win-loss of the various political parties and the percentage of houses that continued to exhibit the poster(s) or lawn signs in favor of that party.
Journal ArticleDOI
Drawing Familiar or Unfamiliar Cards: Stimulus Familiarity, Chance Orientation, and the Illusion of Control
Patrick Bouts,Eddy Van Avermaet +1 more
TL;DR: This article examined a condition under which the effect of stimulus familiarity on the illusion of control is suppressed and found that people wagered more money when playing with the familiar cards unless they had to evaluate their probability of winning before placing their bet.