scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Eilish McAuliffe published in 2014"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Key ‘tipping points’ that drive staff to seriously consider leaving their jobs are revealed and staff motivation and an enabling environment are crucial factors for retaining MLPs in the Malawian health system.
Abstract: Background Malawi faces a severe shortage of health workers, a factor that has contributed greatly to high maternal mortality in the country. Most clinical care is performed by mid-level providers (MLPs). While utilization of these cadres in providing health care is a solution to the current shortages, demotivating factors within the Malawian health system are pushing them into private, non-governmental, and other non-health related positions. This study aims to highlight these demotivating factors by exploring the critical aspects that influence MLPs’ intention to leave their jobs.

71 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The main themes identified were the perceived benefits of IHEs, the difficulties experienced with the distribution of charitable donations, the emotional impact on the students of participating in the I HEs, awareness of scope of practice by students, and issues with the current structure of Ihes.
Abstract: Background: Irish medical students have a long and proud history of embarking on international health electives (IHEs) to broaden their experience in the developing world. Although there are many opinions in the literature about IHEs, there is a dearth of empirical research that explores the experience and the value of these experiences to medical students. Most students who participate in these IHEs from Irish medical schools are members of student IHE societies, which are entirely run by students themselves. There are varying levels of preparation and interaction with the medical schools in planning these experiences. This study explores the experiences of a sample of students who completed IHEs in 2012. Methods: This qualitative study used anonymized one-on-one interviews with medical students in Irish medical schools who completed IHEs to developing countries in 2012. Students were recruited using online noticeboards of student societies and e-mail. Purposive sampling was used to find students from different medical schools, some who had travelled with medical student IHE societies and others who had travelled independently. Seven male and seven female students participated. Interviews were conducted until saturation was reached. Data were then analyzed thematically. Results: The main themes identified were the perceived benefits of IHEs, the difficulties experienced with the distribution of charitable donations, the emotional impact on the students of participating in the IHEs, awareness of scope of practice by students, and issues with the current structure of IHEs. Conclusions: The informal relationship that currently exists between student societies and the medical schools results in poor accountability and reporting requirements on IHEs. Clearer guidelines and identification of learning outcomes for students would be helpful. The findings are relevant to medical students internationally.

18 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This research provides support for the importance of an early-stage participatory evaluation of beneficiaries’ perceptions of newly initiated health programmes and supports how evaluations conducted in the early phases of programme implementation can provide valuable, timely feedback as well as yield recommendations for programme adjustment or re-alignment, and in turn, better meet end-user expectations.
Abstract: Background: The systematic involvement of project beneficiaries in community maternal and child health programmes remains low and limited, especially during the formative stages of the project cycle. Understanding how positive and negative feedbacks obtained from communities can subsequently be used to inform and iterate existing programmes is an important step towards ensuring the success of community health workers for maternal and child health programming and, ultimately, for improving health outcomes. Methods: The study took place over a period of 4 weeks in North Rukiga, Kabale District of southwestern Uganda. Using a cross-sectional qualitative study that employed an epistemological approach of phenomenology, nine focus group discussions and eight in-depth interviews were conducted with a total of 76 female participants across six different sites. Women were identified as either users or non-users of the maternal and child health programme. Purposeful sampling was employed to recruit women from six different locations within the programme catchment area. Translated and transcribed transcripts were subjected to a bottom-up thematic analysis using NVivo 10 Software, whereby themes were arrived at inductively. Results: Predominant themes emerging from the focus groups and key informant interviews identified early trends in programme strengths. Beneficiaries reported confidence in both the programme and the relationships they had forged with community health workers, exhibited pride in the knowledge they had received, and described improved spousal involvement. Beneficiaries also identified a number of programme challenges including barriers to adopting the behaviours promoted by the programme, and highlighted issues with programme dependency and perceived ownership. It also emerged that community health workers were not reaching the entire population of intended programme beneficiaries. Conclusions: This research provides support for the importance of an early-stage participatory evaluation of beneficiaries’ perceptions of newly initiated health programmes. Our results support how evaluations conducted in the early phases of programme implementation can provide valuable, timely feedback as well as yield recommendations for programme adjustment or re-alignment, and in turn, better meet end-user expectations. Potential reasons for the observed lack of community participation in early stages of programme implementation are considered.

17 citations


Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 2014
TL;DR: The United Nations defines poverty as poverties of opportunity, including being denied access to good health, education, and decent work as mentioned in this paper, and the empowerment of individuals in work, for health and in education.
Abstract: The United Nations defines poverty as poverties of opportunity, including being denied access to good health, education, and decent work. Freedoms like these imply good health and educational services, staffed by motivated workers, and industries that are socially responsible toward their employees and the communities in which they operate. A psychology that is anti-poverty must therefore by definition include the empowerment of individuals in work, for health and in education. It must also connect with policy-makers and communities — contributing to the science of implementation. This chapter articulates a Humanitarian work psychology of empowerment. Research must speak “truth to power,” naming, shaming, and issuing challenges to extant development inequities: A continuing “economic apartheid” in aid workers’ wages; “brain waste” through employment discrimination against skilled (and relatively unskilled) migrants; transforming corporate social responsibility from image management to community empowerment; “task-shifting” health-care delivery from ensconced imported health professionals to local mid-level cadres; and influencing policy development and planning on social inclusion, for people living with disability. These cross-contextual cases also show how organizations can be more effective “capacitors” for human development. Taking empowerment seriously requires that industrial-organizational (I-O) psychology, just like organizations themselves, become a servant of empowerment.

9 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Great efforts need to be made to progress clinical governance in the primary care services and there is a need to institute systems that enable learning form errors, to involve the public and patient groups and to invest in research that enables answers to the how and why questions that are so often neglected in the reform process.
Abstract: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explain the path that the Irish health system has taken towards achieving good clinical governance, exploring the historical influences on its’ development, some of the major initiatives that have been implemented and the obstacles that have been encountered. Design/methodology/approach – The paper draws on the author's experience researching and teaching in health systems and healthcare management. Findings – The paper offers some explanations for why earlier attempts failed to change the system as well as why recent attempts have met with more success. Greater efforts need to be made to progress clinical governance in the primary care services. In addition it is argued that there is a need to institute systems that enable learning form errors, to involve the public and patient groups and to invest in research that enables answers to the how and why questions that are so often neglected in the reform process. Originality/value – The paper discusses clinical gover...

5 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The EquitAble project identified contextual and process learning points, factors often not discussed in papers, which typically focus on the reporting of the ‘content’ of results.
Abstract: Background: The ‘EquitAble’ project carried out content analyses of policies and collected and analysed qualitative and quantitative data concerning access to health services in Sudan, Malawi, Namibia and South Africa. Our particular concern was to address the situation of people with disabilities, although not in isolation from other marginalised or vulnerable groups. Objectives: This article reports on the content, context, process and impact of project EquitAble, funded by the European Commission Seventh Research Framework Programme, which brought together researchers from Ireland, Norway, South Africa, Namibia, Sudan and Malawi. Method: After the 4-year project ended in February 2013, all members of the consortium were asked to anonymously complete a bespoke questionnaire designed by the coordinating team. The purpose of the questionnaire was to capture the views of those who collaborated on the research project in relation to issues of content, context, process and impact of the EquitAble project. Results: Our results indicated some of the successes and challenges encountered by our consortium. Conclusion: We identified contextual and process learning points, factors often not discussed in papers, which typically focus on the reporting of the ‘content’ of results.

3 citations