E
Elena J. Eisman
Researcher at Wellesley College
Publications - 7
Citations - 1990
Elena J. Eisman is an academic researcher from Wellesley College. The author has contributed to research in topics: Managed care & Test validity. The author has an hindex of 7, co-authored 7 publications receiving 1875 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Psychological Testing and Psychological Assessment: A Review of Evidence and Issues.
Gregory J. Meyer,Stephen E. Finn,Lorraine D. Eyde,Gary G. Kay,Kevin L. Moreland,Robert R. Dies,Elena J. Eisman,Tom W. Kubiszyn,Geoffrey M. Reed +8 more
TL;DR: It is suggested that a multimethod assessment battery provides a structured means for skilled clinicians to maximize the validity of individualized assessments.
Journal ArticleDOI
A Cube Model for Competency Development: Implications for Psychology Educators and Regulators
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a conceptual framework for training in professional psychology focused on the construct of competency, and a 3-dimensional competency model delineating the domains of knowledge, skills, attitudes, and values that serve as the foundation required of all psychologists.
Journal ArticleDOI
Psychological practice and managed care: Results of the CAPP practitioner survey.
Journal ArticleDOI
Empirical support for psychological assessment in clinical health care settings.
Tom W. Kubiszyn,Gregory J. Meyer,Stephen E. Finn,Lorraine D. Eyde,Gary G. Kay,Kevin L. Moreland,Robert R. Dies,Elena J. Eisman +7 more
TL;DR: A sample of the considerable empirical support that exists for the utility and validity of a variety of psychological tests for a wide range of clinical health care applications is reviewed.
Journal ArticleDOI
Problems and limitations in using psychological assessment in the contemporary health care delivery system.
Elena J. Eisman,Robert R. Dies,Stephen E. Finn,Lorraine D. Eyde,Gary G. Kay,Tom W. Kubiszyn,Gregory J. Meyer,Kevin L. Moreland +7 more
TL;DR: The barriers to access for assessment services, including resistance to psychological assessment, difficulties in the preauthorization process, problems with reimbursement, the clinical decision-making process, and larger systems issues are explored.