E
Elio Berutti
Researcher at University of Turin
Publications - 101
Citations - 3356
Elio Berutti is an academic researcher from University of Turin. The author has contributed to research in topics: Root canal & Medicine. The author has an hindex of 29, co-authored 92 publications receiving 2928 citations. Previous affiliations of Elio Berutti include University of Bologna.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Penetration ability of different irrigants into dentinal tubules.
TL;DR: Dentinal tubules of human root canal walls were infected with a known bacterial isolate and the teeth were divided into two groups and the root canals instrumentated to neutralize the action of the agents used.
Journal ArticleDOI
Influence of Manual Preflaring and Torque on the Failure Rate of ProTaper Rotary Instruments
TL;DR: Manual preflaring creates a glide path for the instrument tip and is a major determinant in reducing the failure rate of these rotary nickel-titanium files.
Journal ArticleDOI
Canal Shaping with WaveOne Primary Reciprocating Files and ProTaper System: A Comparative Study
Elio Berutti,Giorgio Chiandussi,Davide Salvatore Paolino,Nicola Scotti,Giuseppe Cantatore,Arnaldo Castellucci,Damiano Pasqualini +6 more
TL;DR: Canon modifications are reduced when the new WaveOne NiTi single-file system is used and the instrument factor was extremely significant.
Journal ArticleDOI
Comparative analysis of torsional and bending stresses in two mathematical models of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: ProTaper versus ProFile.
TL;DR: This study aimed to compare the mechanical behavior of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments (ProTaper and ProFile) by applying the finite element analysis method to produce a numerical evaluation.
Journal ArticleDOI
Use of nickel-titanium rotary PathFile to create the glide path: comparison with manual preflaring in simulated root canals.
Elio Berutti,Giuseppe Cantatore,Arnaldo Castellucci,Giorgio Chiandussi,Francesco Pera,Giuseppe Migliaretti,Damiano Pasqualini +6 more
TL;DR: No expertise-related difference was found within instrument groups (P > .05), whereas the inexpert clinician produced more conservative shaping with Pathfiles than did the expert with manual preflaring (P < .01).