scispace - formally typeset
E

Elizabeth A. Shirtcliff

Researcher at Iowa State University

Publications -  141
Citations -  10729

Elizabeth A. Shirtcliff is an academic researcher from Iowa State University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Testosterone (patch). The author has an hindex of 47, co-authored 119 publications receiving 9391 citations. Previous affiliations of Elizabeth A. Shirtcliff include University of Wisconsin-Madison & Pennsylvania State University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Adaptive Calibration Model of stress responsivity.

TL;DR: The Adaptive Calibration Model is presented, an evolutionary-developmental theory of individual differences in the functioning of the stress response system that extends the theory of biological sensitivity to context (BSC) and provides an integrative framework for future research in the field.
Journal ArticleDOI

Disorders of childhood and adolescence: gender and psychopathology.

TL;DR: This review focuses on biological and environmental factors implicated in the development of conduct problems and depression in boys and girls and considers male-like and female-like characteristics to explore how they inform biological andEnvironmental theories about gender and psychopathology.
Journal ArticleDOI

Pubertal development: correspondence between hormonal and physical development.

TL;DR: The interrelation of multiple indices of puberty was examined, including the Pubertal Development Scale, a picture-based interview about puberty (PBIP), and a physical exam, finding multiple measures of puberty are viable options, each with respective strengths.
Journal ArticleDOI

Behavioral Problems After Early Life Stress: Contributions of the Hippocampus and Amygdala

TL;DR: This study suggests ELS may shape the development of brain areas involved with emotion processing and regulation in similar ways, and differences in the amygdala and hippocampus may be a shared diathesis for later negative outcomes related to ELS.
Journal ArticleDOI

Use of salivary biomarkers in biobehavioral research: cotton-based sample collection methods can interfere with salivary immunoassay results.

TL;DR: It was shown that the cotton interference effect is of sufficient magnitude to attenuate the association between serum and saliva levels and the order of individual results from samples collected using cotton versus no-cotton methods for certain markers is not conserved, suggesting that for some biomarkers this collection method can be a significant source of unsystematic error.