E
Elizabeth K. Nisbet
Researcher at Trent University
Publications - 15
Citations - 3303
Elizabeth K. Nisbet is an academic researcher from Trent University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Nature connectedness & Social connectedness. The author has an hindex of 10, co-authored 13 publications receiving 2561 citations. Previous affiliations of Elizabeth K. Nisbet include Carleton University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The Nature Relatedness scale: Linking individuals' connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior.
TL;DR: This article propose a new construct, Nature Relatedness (NR), and a scale that assesses the affective, cognitivistic, and cognate nature relatedness of humans.
Journal ArticleDOI
Happiness is in our Nature: Exploring Nature Relatedness as a Contributor to Subjective Well-Being
TL;DR: In this article, Nisbet et al. explored associations between nature relatedness and a variety of well-being indicators, and used multiple regression analyses to demonstrate the unique relationship of NR with wellbeing, while controlling for other environmental measures.
Journal ArticleDOI
Happiness and Feeling Connected: The Distinct Role of Nature Relatedness
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors assessed the overlap between nature relatedness and other subjective connections (e.g., with friends or country) and examined these connections as a possible confound in explaining the link between nature-relatedness and happiness.
Journal ArticleDOI
The NR-6: a new brief measure of nature relatedness.
TL;DR: A short-form version of the nature relatedness scale (NR-6), comprised of 6 items from the “self” and “experience” dimensions, is developed and tested and demonstrated good internal consistency, temporal stability, and predicted happiness, environmental concern, and nature contact.
Journal ArticleDOI
Underestimating Nearby Nature Affective Forecasting Errors Obscure the Happy Path to Sustainability
TL;DR: It is found that although outdoor walks in nearby nature made participants much happier than indoor walks did, participants made affective forecasting errors, such that they systematically underestimated nature’s hedonic benefit.