scispace - formally typeset
E

Elizabeth Nisbet

Researcher at John Jay College of Criminal Justice

Publications -  11
Citations -  78

Elizabeth Nisbet is an academic researcher from John Jay College of Criminal Justice. The author has contributed to research in topics: Public policy & Immigration policy. The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 11 publications receiving 62 citations. Previous affiliations of Elizabeth Nisbet include City University of New York.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Philanthropic Partnerships in the Just City: Parks and Schools:

TL;DR: The role of private funding and management in U.S. urban public services has expanded through the auspices of private nonprofit organizations in formal relationships with government and aided by la....
Journal ArticleDOI

Expanding the Field of View: The Role of Agricultural Employers in Street-Level Immigration Policy Implementation:

TL;DR: More than half the U.S. farm labor force is undocumented, and thousands of employers hire farmworkers through the short-term H-2A visa program as mentioned in this paper, which is illegal.
Journal ArticleDOI

Regulating private support for public goods: de-clubbing public schools

TL;DR: The trend may be most pronounced and longstanding in the US, according to as discussed by the authors, who argue that "urban schools in many OECD countries are contending with policy trends that squeeze budgets and incentivize parent fundraising".
Journal ArticleDOI

Where Policy Meets Practice: Employer Perspectives on Scheduling and Hours for Home Care Aides.

TL;DR: How the competing influences of health care, labor, and employment policy shape scheduling and a review of how recommendations for changes in policy and practice in other sectors might apply to home care are examined.
Journal ArticleDOI

A hands-on hands-off approach: governance of managed long-term care services in a context of rapid policy change

TL;DR: Drawing from interviews with staff of service-providing agencies, this case study reveals outcomes contrary to goals: administrative complexity, containment of care, and unexpected costs.