scispace - formally typeset
E

Emmanuel Keuleers

Researcher at Tilburg University

Publications -  54
Citations -  4847

Emmanuel Keuleers is an academic researcher from Tilburg University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Lexical decision task & Word lists by frequency. The author has an hindex of 26, co-authored 54 publications receiving 3827 citations. Previous affiliations of Emmanuel Keuleers include University of Antwerp & Ghent University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English

TL;DR: A new measure of word frequency, the Zipf scale, is introduced, which the authors hope will stop the current misunderstandings of the word frequency effect.
Journal ArticleDOI

Wuggy: a multilingual pseudoword generator.

TL;DR: This work presents a pseudoword generator that improves on current methods and allows for the generation of written polysyllabic pseudowords that obey a given language’s phonotactic constraints.
Journal ArticleDOI

SUBTLEX-NL: a new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles.

TL;DR: A new database of Dutch word frequencies based on film and television subtitles is presented, and an accessibility measure based on contextual diversity explains more of the variance in accuracy and RT than does the raw frequency of occurrence counts.
Journal ArticleDOI

Explaining human performance in psycholinguistic tasks with models of semantic similarity based on prediction and counting : A review and empirical validation

TL;DR: It is argued that a new class of prediction-based models that are trained on a text corpus and that measure semantic similarity between words bridge the gap between traditional approaches to distributional semantics and psychologically plausible learning principles.
Journal ArticleDOI

The British Lexicon Project: lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words

TL;DR: The high correlation between the BLP and ELP data indicates that a high percentage of variance in lexical decision data sets is systematic variance, rather than noise, and that the results of megastudies are rather robust with respect to the selection and presentation of the stimuli.