Inhibition and impulsivity: Behavioral and neural basis of response control

Impulsivity as a vulnerability marker for substance-use disorders: Review of findings from high-risk research, problem gamblers and genetic association studies

Opposite effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol on human brain function and psychopathology.

:Cannabis use may impair cognitive functions on a number of levels—from basic motor coordination to more complex executive function tasks, such as the ability to plan, organize, solve problems, make decisions, remember, and control emotions and behavior. These deficits differ in severity dep

/pdf/an-evidence-based-review-of-acute-and-long-term-effects-of-3du9btgxlj.pdf

An Evidence Based Review of Acute and Long-Term Effects of Cannabis Use on Executive Cognitive Functions

BACKGROUND: Cannabis is the most prevalent illicit drug identified in impaired drivers. The effects of cannabis on driving continue to be debated, making prosecution and legislation difficult. Historically, delays in sample collection, evaluating the inactive Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) metabolite 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC, and polydrug use have complicated epidemiologic evaluations of driver impairment after cannabis use.

CONTENT: We review and evaluate the current literature on cannabis' effects on driving, highlighting the epidemiologic and experimental data. Epidemiologic data show that the risk of involvement in a motor vehicle accident (MVA) increases approximately 2-fold after cannabis smoking. The adjusted risk of driver culpability also increases substantially, particularly with increased blood THC concentrations. Studies that have used urine as the biological matrix have not shown an association between cannabis and crash risk. Experimental data show that drivers attempt to compensate by driving more slowly after smoking cannabis, but control deteriorates with increasing task complexity. Cannabis smoking increases lane weaving and impaired cognitive function. Critical-tracking tests, reaction times, divided-attention tasks, and lane-position variability all show cannabis-induced impairment. Despite purported tolerance in frequent smokers, complex tasks still show impairment. Combining cannabis with alcohol enhances impairment, especially lane weaving.

SUMMARY: Differences in study designs frequently account for inconsistencies in results between studies. Participant-selection bias and confounding factors attenuate ostensible cannabis effects, but the association with MVA often retains significance. Evidence suggests recent smoking and/or blood THC concentrations 2–5 ng/mL are associated with substantial driving impairment, particularly in occasional smokers. Future cannabis-and-driving research should emphasize challenging tasks, such as divided attention, and include occasional and chronic daily cannabis smokers.

/pdf/cannabis-effects-on-driving-skills-wf3qftxe1p.pdf

Cannabis Effects on Driving Skills

http://cannabis-truth.yolasite.com/resources/Documents/2/Ref%2035%20-%20High-Potency%20Marijuana%20Impairs%20Executive%20Function%20and%20Inhibitory%20Motor%20Control.pdf

High-Potency Marijuana Impairs Executive Function and Inhibitory Motor Control

Cognition and motor control as a function of Delta9-THC concentration in serum and oral fluid: limits of impairment.

In a study on the effects of smoked cannabis (18.2 +/- 2.8 mg as low and 36.5 +/- 5.6 mg as high dose) paired blood and oral fluid samples were collected from 10 study participants up to 6 h after smoking and analyzed for the cannabinoids Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), 11-hydroxy-THC (THC-OH) and 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC (THCA) using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Highest concentrations in serum were 47.8 +/- 35.0 and 79.1 +/- 42.5 microg/L at the end of smoking (low and high dose, respectively) and decreased to less than 1 microg/L during 6 h with elimination half-lives of 1.4 +/- 0.1 h calculated from 1 to 6 h, which is shorter than reported previously. The elimination half-lives of THC-OH (2.0 +/- 0.3 h) and THCA (3.4 +/- 0.9 h) were significantly higher. The THC concentrations in oral fluid were highest with 900 +/- 589 and 1041 +/- 652 microg/L (low and high dose, respectively) in the first sample collected at 0.25 h and decreased to 18 +/- 12 microg/L over 6 h with elimination half-lives of 1.5 +/- 0.6 h. The elimination half-life of THC in serum and oral fluid and between the two doses did not significantly differ. Oral fluid/serum ratios were 46 +/- 27 and 36 +/- 20 (low and high dose, respectively), which are higher than previously reported and might be based on sample collection and/or analytical issues. In conclusion, despite similar elimination rates of THC in serum and oral fluid, which appear incidental, the high differences in oral fluid/serum ratios are not a reliable basis for correlating THC concentrations in oral fluid and serum. The oral compartment and its kinetics for drugs, particularly THC, are not yet satisfactorily understood.

/pdf/pharmacokinetic-properties-of-delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol-in-3qonfxnn6x.pdf

Erhard Schneider

Papers

High-Potency Marijuana Impairs Executive Function and Inhibitory Motor Control

Cognition and motor control as a function of Delta9-THC concentration in serum and oral fluid: limits of impairment.

Pharmacokinetic properties of delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol in serum and oral fluid