scispace - formally typeset
E

Eric G. Cavalcanti

Researcher at Griffith University

Publications -  86
Citations -  3886

Eric G. Cavalcanti is an academic researcher from Griffith University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Quantum entanglement & Quantum nonlocality. The author has an hindex of 27, co-authored 75 publications receiving 3223 citations. Previous affiliations of Eric G. Cavalcanti include University of Oxford & University of Sydney.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Testing for Multipartite Quantum Nonlocality Using Functional Bell Inequalities

TL;DR: It is shown that arbitrary functions of continuous variables, e.g., position and momentum, can be used to generate tests that distinguish quantum theory from local hidden variable theories, and that optimized functional inequalities are resistant to standard forms of decoherence.
Journal ArticleDOI

Absolute cross sections for multiple ionization of noble gases by swift proton impact

TL;DR: In this article, the absolute cross sections for multiple ionization of He (q = 1), Ne (q 2, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10) atoms by protons in the 075-35 MeV impact energy range have been measured.
Journal ArticleDOI

The View from a Wigner Bubble

TL;DR: Bong et al. as mentioned in this paper showed that the predictions of unitary quantum mechanics for an extended Wigner's friend scenario are incompatible with any theory satisfying three metaphysical assumptions: Absoluteness of Observed Events, Locality and No-Superdeterminism.
Journal ArticleDOI

Uncertainty relations for the realization of macroscopic quantum superpositions and EPR paradoxes

TL;DR: In this paper, a unified approach based on the use of quantum uncertainty relations is presented for arriving at criteria for the demonstration of the EPR paradox and macroscopic superpositions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Causation, Decision Theory, and Bell’s Theorem: A Quantum Analogue of the Newcomb Problem

TL;DR: It is shown that an agent who acts according to CDT and gives any nonzero credence to some possible causal interpretations underlying quantum phenomena should bet against quantum mechanics in some feasible game scenarios involving entangled systems, no matter what evidence they acquire.