scispace - formally typeset
E

Eric J. Deeds

Researcher at University of Kansas

Publications -  60
Citations -  2096

Eric J. Deeds is an academic researcher from University of Kansas. The author has contributed to research in topics: Crosstalk (biology) & Medicine. The author has an hindex of 24, co-authored 52 publications receiving 1822 citations. Previous affiliations of Eric J. Deeds include Santa Fe Institute & Harvard University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Curvature in metabolic scaling

TL;DR: It is shown that the relationship between mass and metabolic rate has convex curvature on a logarithmic scale, and is therefore not a pure power law, even after accounting for body temperature.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sizing up allometric scaling theory.

TL;DR: This work illustrates the utility of the WBE framework in reasoning about allometric scaling, while at the same time suggesting that the current canonical model may need amendments to bring its predictions fully in line with available datasets.
Journal ArticleDOI

A simple physical model for scaling in protein-protein interaction networks

TL;DR: The model presented in this paper represents a physical model for experimentally determined PPIs that comprehensively reproduces the topological features of interaction networks and key support is provided by the discovery of a significant correlation between the number of interactions made by a protein and the fraction of hydrophobic residues on its surface.
Journal ArticleDOI

Fundamental trade-offs between information flow in single cells and cellular populations.

TL;DR: It is proposed that signaling networks exploit noise at the single-cell level to increase population-level information transfer, allowing extracellular ligands, whose levels are also subject to noise, to incrementally regulate phenotypic changes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Crosstalk and the evolution of specificity in two-component signaling

TL;DR: This work used mathematical models to show that introducing crosstalk in TCS always decreases system performance, which indicates that the large-scale differences between eukaryotic and bacterial networks likely derive from differences in the dynamics of the fundamental motifs from which the networks themselves are constructed.