Showing papers by "Erik C. W. Krabbe published in 1986"
•
TL;DR: In this article, Naess discusses how to evaluate reasons advanced to support (and objections advanced to detract from) a given point of view, and discusses some difficulties and possibilities of applying the distinction in contexts of higher order discourse.
Abstract: In his Communication and Argument Arne Naess discusses how to
evaluate reasons advanced to support (and objections advanced to
detract from) a given point of view. 1 According to Naess there
are two distinct issues to be settled with respect to each
separate reason: the issue of its tenability and the issue of its
relevance. The distinction itself is, I think, booth tenable and
relevant. However its application is not as straightforward as
one might at first suppose. I shall in turn discuss some
difficulties and possibilities of applying the distinction in
contexts of:
1. evaluation
2. the production and recognition of higher order reas ons
and objections
3. formal discussion
19 citations
••
TL;DR: On montre que les modeles de Kripke finis de l'arithmetique de Heyting (HA) sont des modeles oficiaux de Peano complete (PA) dans le cadre de laissez-avant-hier.
Abstract: On montre que les modeles de Kripke finis de l'arithmetique de Heyting (HA) sont des modeles de l'arithmetique de Peano complete (PA)
15 citations
••
14 citations