scispace - formally typeset
E

Eva Pajkrt

Researcher at University of Amsterdam

Publications -  266
Citations -  6142

Eva Pajkrt is an academic researcher from University of Amsterdam. The author has contributed to research in topics: Pregnancy & Prenatal diagnosis. The author has an hindex of 39, co-authored 226 publications receiving 4907 citations. Previous affiliations of Eva Pajkrt include University Medical Center Utrecht & Academic Medical Center.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Accuracy of circulating placental growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 and soluble endoglin in the prediction of pre-eclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

TL;DR: Accuracy of circulating placental growth factor, vascular endothelial growthFactor, soluble fms‐like tyrosine kinase 1 and soluble endoglin in the prediction of pre‐eclampsia: a systematic review and meta‐analysis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Prenatal detection of congenital heart disease--results of a national screening programme.

TL;DR: Prenatal detection improves the neonatal condition before surgery, resulting in less morbidity and mortality, and in the Netherlands a national prenatal screening programme was introduced in 2007.
Journal ArticleDOI

Increased nuchal translucency thickness and normal karyotype : time for parental reassurance

TL;DR: To study the outcome of pregnancy in chromosomally normal fetuses with increased nuchal translucency thickness with respect to fetal loss, structural defects and genetic syndromes with developmental delay, and to provide information on the residual risk of adverse outcome when ultrasound findings are normal.
Journal ArticleDOI

Outcome of fetuses with enlarged nuchal translucency and normal karyotype.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the relationship between nuchal translucency measurements and outcome of pregnancy with special regard to fetuses with an enlarged NLL and a normal karyotype.
Journal ArticleDOI

Prognostic models in obstetrics : available, but far from applicable

TL;DR: A large number of prognostic models in obstetrics are identified, but there is relatively little evidence about their performance, impact, and usefulness in clinical practice so that clinical implementation cannot be recommended.