Eveline Schollaert

TL;DR: The authors conducted a large-scale quantitative review of published response rates, which allowed a fine-grained comparison of response rates across respondent groups and analyzed response enhancing techniques across respondents across different groups.

TL;DR: In this paper, an empirically-based review of the strengths and weaknesses of situational judgment tests (SJTs) is given, in terms of reliability, criterion related validity, incremental validity, construct-related validity, utility, adverse impact, applicant perceptions, fakability and susceptibility to practice and coaching effects.

TL;DR: The authors developed and tested a reflection strategy to stimulate deeper learning after feedback, and found that reflection combined with feedback enhanced performance improvement on a web-based work simulation better than feedback alone.

TL;DR: This article contributes to the understanding of why the use of a frame-of-reference leads to increased criterion-related validity of personality inventories by providing an explanation for the moderate validities of generic Personality inventories.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present perspectives from 22 countries on aspects of the legal environment for selection, including whether there are racial/ethnic/religious subgroups viewed as "disadvantaged", whether research documents mean differences between groups on individual difference measures relevant to job performance, whether laws prohibiting discrimination against specific groups, the evidence required to make and refute a claim of discrimination, the consequences of violation of the laws, whether particular selection methods are limited or banned, whether preferential treatment of members of disadvantaged groups is permitted, and whether the practice of industrial and organizational psychology has been affected by