scispace - formally typeset
E

Evrim Acar

Researcher at University of Copenhagen

Publications -  69
Citations -  4916

Evrim Acar is an academic researcher from University of Copenhagen. The author has contributed to research in topics: Tensor & Sensor fusion. The author has an hindex of 29, co-authored 61 publications receiving 4284 citations. Previous affiliations of Evrim Acar include Gebze Institute of Technology & University of Copenhagen Faculty of Science.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Scalable tensor factorizations for incomplete data

TL;DR: An algorithm called CP-WOPT (CP Weighted OPTimization) that uses a first-order optimization approach to solve the weighted least squares problem and is shown to successfully factorize tensors with noise and up to 99% missing data.
Journal ArticleDOI

Unsupervised Multiway Data Analysis: A Literature Survey

TL;DR: This work provides a review of significant contributions in the literature on multiway models, algorithms as well as their applications in diverse disciplines including chemometrics, neuroscience, social network analysis, text mining and computer vision.
Journal ArticleDOI

Temporal Link Prediction Using Matrix and Tensor Factorizations

TL;DR: In this article, a weight-based method for collapsing multi-year data into a single matrix was proposed, which can be extended to bipartite graphs and moreover approximated in a scalable way using a truncated singular value decomposition.
Journal ArticleDOI

Temporal Link Prediction using Matrix and Tensor Factorizations

TL;DR: This article considers bipartite graphs that evolve over time and considers matrix- and tensor-based methods for predicting future links and shows that Tensor- based techniques are particularly effective for temporal data with varying periodic patterns.
Journal ArticleDOI

A scalable optimization approach for fitting canonical tensor decompositions

TL;DR: The mathematical calculation of the derivatives of the canonical tensor decomposition is discussed and it is shown that they can be computed efficiently, at the same cost as one iteration of ALS, which is more accurate than ALS and faster than NLS in terms of total computation time.