BACKGROUND The introduction of solid-phase immunoassay (SPI) technology for the detection and characterization of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in transplantation while providing greater sensitivity than was obtainable by complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity (CDC) assays has resulted in a new paradigm with respect to the interpretation of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Although the SPI assay performed on the Luminex instrument (hereafter referred to as the Luminex assay), in particular, has permitted the detection of antibodies not detectable by CDC, the clinical significance of these antibodies is incompletely understood. Nevertheless, the detection of these antibodies has led to changes in the clinical management of sensitized patients. In addition, SPI testing raises technical issues that require resolution and careful consideration when interpreting antibody results. METHODS With this background, The Transplantation Society convened a group of laboratory and clinical experts in the field of transplantation to prepare a consensus report and make recommendations on the use of this new technology based on both published evidence and expert opinion. Three working groups were formed to address (a) the technical issues with respect to the use of this technology, (b) the interpretation of pretransplantation antibody testing in the context of various clinical settings and organ transplant types (kidney, heart, lung, liver, pancreas, intestinal, and islet cells), and (c) the application of antibody testing in the posttransplantation setting. The three groups were established in November 2011 and convened for a "Consensus Conference on Antibodies in Transplantation" in Rome, Italy, in May 2012. The deliberations of the three groups meeting independently and then together are the bases for this report. RESULTS A comprehensive list of recommendations was prepared by each group. A summary of the key recommendations follows. Technical Group: (a) SPI must be used for the detection of pretransplantation HLA antibodies in solid organ transplant recipients and, in particular, the use of the single-antigen bead assay to detect antibodies to HLA loci, such as Cw, DQA, DPA, and DPB, which are not readily detected by other methods. (b) The use of SPI for antibody detection should be supplemented with cell-based assays to examine the correlations between the two types of assays and to establish the likelihood of a positive crossmatch (XM). (c) There must be an awareness of the technical factors that can influence the results and their clinical interpretation when using the Luminex bead technology, such as variation in antigen density and the presence of denatured antigen on the beads. Pretransplantation Group: (a) Risk categories should be established based on the antibody and the XM results obtained. (b) DSA detected by CDC and a positive XM should be avoided due to their strong association with antibody-mediated rejection and graft loss. (c) A renal transplantation can be performed in the absence of a prospective XM if single-antigen bead screening for antibodies to all class I and II HLA loci is negative. This decision, however, needs to be taken in agreement with local clinical programs and the relevant regulatory bodies. (d) The presence of DSA HLA antibodies should be avoided in heart and lung transplantation and considered a risk factor for liver, intestinal, and islet cell transplantation. Posttransplantation Group: (a) High-risk patients (i.e., desensitized or DSA positive/XM negative) should be monitored by measurement of DSA and protocol biopsies in the first 3 months after transplantation. (b) Intermediate-risk patients (history of DSA but currently negative) should be monitored for DSA within the first month. If DSA is present, a biopsy should be performed. (c) Low-risk patients (nonsensitized first transplantation) should be screened for DSA at least once 3 to 12 months after transplantation. If DSA is detected, a biopsy should be performed. In all three categories, the recommendations for subsequent treatment are based on the biopsy results. CONCLUSIONS A comprehensive list of recommendations is provided covering the technical and pretransplantation and posttransplantation monitoring of HLA antibodies in solid organ transplantation. The recommendations are intended to provide state-of-the-art guidance in the use and clinical application of recently developed methods for HLA antibody detection when used in conjunction with traditional methods.

https://www.nefro.cl/DOCS/evento1/papers/Consesus_Guide_lines_Anti-HLA_2013_Dr.%20Jimenez.pdf

Consensus guidelines on the testing and clinical management issues associated with HLA and non-HLA antibodies in transplantation.

The 2020 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation is intended to assist health care professionals worldwide who evaluate and manage potential candidates for deceased or living donor kidney transplantation. This guideline addresses general candidacy issues such as access to transplantation, patient demographic and health status factors, and immunological and psychosocial assessment. The roles of various risk factors and comorbid conditions governing an individual's suitability for transplantation such as adherence, tobacco use, diabetes, obesity, perioperative issues, causes of kidney failure, infections, malignancy, pulmonary disease, cardiac and peripheral arterial disease, neurologic disease, gastrointestinal and liver disease, hematologic disease, and bone and mineral disorder are also addressed. This guideline provides recommendations for evaluation of individual aspects of a candidate's profile such that each risk factor and comorbidity are considered separately. The goal is to assist the clinical team to assimilate all data relevant to an individual, consider this within their local health context, and make an overall judgment on candidacy for transplantation. The guideline development process followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Guideline recommendations are primarily based on systematic reviews of relevant studies and our assessment of the quality of that evidence, and the strengths of recommendations are provided. Limitations of the evidence are discussed with differences from previous guidelines noted and suggestions for future research are also provided.

https://eprints.ncl.ac.uk/file_store/production/266238/15F1B560-37DA-45A8-BD43-3FDED3E6A14B.pdf

KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the evaluation and management of candidates for kidney transplantation

The European Best Practice Guideline group (EBPG) issued guidelines on the evaluation and selection of kidney donor and kidney transplant candidates, as well as post-transplant recipient care, in the year 2000 and 2002. The new European Renal Best Practice board decided in 2009 that these guidelines needed updating. In order to avoid duplication of efforts with kidney disease improving global outcomes, which published in 2009 clinical practice guidelines on the post-transplant care of kidney transplant recipients, we did not address these issues in the present guidelines.The guideline was developed following a rigorous methodological approach: (i) identification of clinical questions, (ii) prioritization of questions, (iii) systematic literature review and critical appraisal of available evidence and (iv) formulation of recommendations and grading according to Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). The strength of each recommendation is rated 1 or 2, with 1 being a 'We recommend' statement, and 2 being a 'We suggest' statement. In addition, each statement is assigned an overall grade for the quality of evidence: A (high), B (moderate), C (low) or D (very low). The guideline makes recommendations for the evaluation of the kidney transplant candidate as well as the potential deceased and living donor, the immunological work-up of kidney donors and recipients and perioperative recipient care.All together, the work group issued 112 statements. There were 51 (45%) recommendations graded '1', 18 (16%) were graded '2' and 43 (38%) statements were not graded. There were 0 (0%) recommendations graded '1A', 15 (13%) were '1B', 19 (17%) '1C' and 17 (15%) '1D'. None (0%) were graded '2A', 1 (0.9%) was '2B', 8 (7%) were '2C' and 9 (8%) '2D'. Limitations of the evidence, especially the lack of definitive clinical outcome trials, are discussed and suggestions are provided for future research.We present here the complete recommendations about the evaluation of the kidney transplant candidate as well as the potential deceased and living donor, the immunological work-up of kidney donors and recipients and the perioperative recipient care. We hope that this document will help caregivers to improve the quality of care they deliver to patients. The full version with methods, rationale and references is published in Nephrol Dial Transplant (2013) 28: i1-i71; doi: 10.1093/ndt/gft218 and can be downloaded freely from http://www.oxfordjournals.org/our_journals/ndt/era_edta.html.

European Renal Best Practice Guideline on kidney donor and recipient evaluation and perioperative care

BACKGROUND: Defining the clinical relevance of donor-specific HLA-antibodies detected by single-antigen flow-beads (SAFB) is important because these assays are increasingly used for pretransplant risk assessment and organ allocation. The aims of this study were to investigate to which extent HLA-DSA detected by SAFB represent a risk for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and diminished allograft survival, and to define HLA-DSA characteristics predictive for AMR. METHODS: In this retrospective study of 334 patients with negative complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatches, day-of-transplant sera were analyzed by SAFB, HLA-DSA determined by virtual crossmatching, and the results correlated with the occurrence of AMR and allograft survival. RESULTS: Sixty-seven of 334 patients (20%) had HLA-DSA. The incidence of clinical/subclinical AMR at day 200 posttransplant was significantly higher in patients with HLA-DSA than in patients without HLA-DSA (55% vs. 6%; P>0.0001). Notably, 30/67 patients with HLA-DSA (45%) did not experience clinical/subclinical AMR. Death-censored 5-year allograft survival was equal in patient without HLA-DSA and patients with HLA-DSA but no AMR (89% vs. 87%; P=0.95), whereas it was 20% lower in patients with HLA-DSA and AMR (68%; P=0.002). The number, class, and cumulative strength of HLA-DSA determined by SAFB, and prior sensitizing events were not predictive for the occurrence of AMR. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the utility of SAFB for pretransplant risk assessment and organ allocation, and suggest that improvement of the positive predictive value of HLA-DSA defined by SAFB will require an enhanced definition of pathogenic factors of HLA-DSA.

Clinical relevance of pretransplant donor-specific HLA antibodies detected by single-antigen flow-beads.

The effect of low titers of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) detected only by sensitive solid-phase assays (SPAs) on renal transplant outcomes is unclear. We report the results of a systematic review and meta-analysis of rejection rates and graft outcomes for renal transplant recipients with such preformed DSAs, defined by positive results on SPA but negative complement-dependent cytotoxicity and flow cytometry crossmatch results. Our search identified seven retrospective cohort studies comprising a total of 1119 patients, including 145 with isolated DSA-SPA. Together, these studies suggest that the presence of DSA-SPA, despite a negative flow cytometry crossmatch result, nearly doubles the risk for antibody-mediated rejection (relative risk [RR], 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-2.89; P<0.001) and increases the risk for graft failure by 76% (RR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.13-2.74; P=0.01). These results suggest that donor selection should consider the presence of antibodies in the recipient, identified by the SPA, even in the presence of a negative flow cytometry crossmatch result.

/pdf/donor-specific-antibodies-adversely-affect-kidney-allograft-q592i5iqgk.pdf

Donor-Specific Antibodies Adversely Affect Kidney Allograft Outcomes

Background Highly sensitized (HS) patients (>85% panel-reactive antibodies) have a lower chance of receiving a donor kidney. Within Eurotransplant the Acceptable Mismatch (AM) program was developed to increase the chances of HS patients to receive a crossmatch-negative donor kidney. The standard crossmatch in the AM program is based on complement-dependent cytotoxicity. Methods In this study we wanted to determine the clinical relevance of human leukocyte antigen donor-directed antibodies (DDA) detected by the single antigen (SA) bead technique, in the pretransplant sera of HS patients transplanted in our center through the Eurotransplant AM program. Results From 34 AM patients, 27 were transplanted with 1 to 5 mismatches and 7 received a 0-mismatched graft. From the mismatched patients, retrospectively, 13 proved to possess pretransplant DDA by SA whereas 14 did not. No antibodies were found in the 0-mismatched group. Comparison of the DDA+ and DDA- patients in the human leukocyte antigen-mismatched donor/recipient combinations revealed a trend to an earlier and higher number of rejection episodes in DDA+ patients (P=0.08). No detrimental effect of DDA on graft survival was observed. Conclusions This single-center study showed that in the AM program DDA detected by SA, and not by less-sensitive methods, may be related to acute rejection episodes but is not detrimental to long-term graft outcome. These findings question the increasing use of more-sensitive screening techniques for the allocation of organs.

Clinical relevance of pretransplant donor-directed antibodies detected by single antigen beads in highly sensitized renal transplant patients.

Background. Donor-directed antibodies (DDA) have been shown to result in poor graft survival. This Study was designed to analyze antibody appearance and patient and graft characteristics related to antibody formation in patients who lost their graft at different time points after transplantation. Methods. Pre- and posttransplant sera of 56 DDA-negative first transplant patients were screened for human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and II DDA by the Luminex single antigen assay (LSA). All patients were treated with calcineurine inhibitor-based immunosuppression. Results. Three of 56 patients proved DDA positive by LSA before transplantation. Eighty-one percent of the remaining 53 patients became DDA class I or II positive or both; 16% before and 84% after transplantectomy. Class I antibodies were produced in 84% and class 11 in 77% of the recipients. Based on time of transplantectomy, three groups were created as follows: less than or equal to I month, 1 to 6 months, and more than 6 months. The groups proved to be significantly different for HLA class II mismatch and acute rejection. All recipients in group I to 6 months proved to be DDA positive. Logistic regression analysis showed that DDA positivity for class I was related to higher donor age and donor type (nonheart beating), class II to higher donor age and class II mismatch. Conclusions. Donor-directed HLA antibodies after transplantation were demonstrated in 81% of first transplant recipients, all of whom were DDA negative by LSA before transplantation. The majority of the antibodies was found after transplantectomy. These findings may have to be taken into consideration in the allocation of organs of marginal donors such as older or nonheart beating kidneys.

Donor-directed HLA antibodies before and after transplantectomy detected by the luminex single antigen assay.

In Luminex bead-based screening assays, color-coded microspheres coated with human leukocyte antigens (HLA) are used to identify both complement-binding and non-complement-binding HLA class I and II antibodies in recipient sera. Many laboratories rely on their specificity detection and use the information obtained for allocation of donor organs. A donor-specific crossmatch in the Luminex technique (LumXm) is for that reason desirable. A LumXm, in which the actual donor HLA are coated onto specific capture beads, was tested for 88 pre- and posttransplant sera of 18 recipients. The results were compared with previously published flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXm) results for the same donor-recipient combinations. All sera were also examined by Luminex single antigen (SA) tests. Class I LumXm detected 24 of 27 T-cell positive FCXm (89%) and class II 15 of 22 B-cell positive FCXm (68%). Sensitivity of LumXm for class I and II was 89% and 68% and specificity was 98% and 97%, respectively. Discrepant LumXm results were obtained in 13 sera of nine patients (15%). In general, based on SA testing, FCXm showed false-positive results for class I and LumXm gave false-negative and positive results for class II. The LumXm test was proven not to react with recipient sera containing DQ antibodies only, also DP detection was insufficient. The validity of the LumXm has been shown for class I, but its value for class II is uncertain. HLA-DR is most probably correctly identified, the validity for DQ and DP is doubtful.

Luminex donor‐specific crossmatches

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DP is considered a target for humoral immune response in clinical transplantation. This study analyses the incidence of HLA-DP antibodies in renal patients. Development and epitope specificity of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and non-DSA (NDSA) were examined. Pre- and posttransplant sera of 338 patients were screened for HLA-DP antibodies using the luminex single antigen assay. Positive patients, partners and/or kidney donors were HLA-DP typed by sequence-specific oligonucleotides. Potential epitopes were mapped by comparing the amino acid sequences of HLA-DP hypervariable regions (HVR) A-F of recipient, partner and/or donor. Specificities in the sera were aligned to deduce the HVR motif responsible for the antibodies. HLA-DP antibodies were detected in 14% of the patients (48/338). Before transplantation, the antibodies were shown in 23% (10 females and 1 male) and 77% were found after transplantation (30 in patients after the first, 7 after the second graft). Specificities were never restricted to individual mismatched antigens; broad HLA-DP sensitization was found as a rule. A single HVR mismatch was present in 80% of the DSA and in 79% of the NDSA. No HLA-DPA specific antibodies were found. Our findings confirm that HLA-DP antibodies are specific for epitopes shared by different HLA-DP antigens, indicating that only a restricted number of mismatched epitopes are recognized by the recipients immune system. Matching for immunogenic HLA-DP epitopes for renal transplantation seems to be functionally more relevant than classical matching at the allelic level.

HLA-DP antibodies before and after renal transplantation.

The clinical significance of the presence of donor-specific anti-human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSA) prior to renal transplantation detected solely by solid-phase techniques remains unclear. This study was designed to determine the clinical relevance of the recently introduced bead-based Luminex donor-specific crossmatch (LumXm). A group of 165 patients transplanted between 1997 and 2001 were tested. Of 165 recipients transplanted with a negative complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch, 32 proved to have a positive Luminex crossmatch. Sixteen were positive for class I, 15 were positive for class II, 1 was both class I and II positive and 133 recipients were negative. Acute rejection (AR)-free survival for all recipients was 77%, and there was no difference in AR-free survival between LumXm-positive and LumXm-negative recipients. Overall graft survival after a median follow-up time of 8 years was 56%. Recipients with a positive class I LumXm had worse long-term graft survival (P = 0.006). In recipients with a positive class I LumXm, 5-year graft survival was 41% vs 70% in negative patients and 10-year graft survival was 27% vs 56%. Positivity for class II LumXm was not a significant risk factor for graft failure (P = 0.7). In conclusion, pretransplant DSA detected by the LumXm had no impact on AR episodes. Class II LumXm positivity proved no significant risk factor for graft failure, but the value of the class II LumXm is questionable. A positive class I LumXm resulted in worse long-term graft survival compared with a negative one.

Evy V.A. Billen

Papers

Clinical relevance of pretransplant donor-directed antibodies detected by single antigen beads in highly sensitized renal transplant patients.

Donor-directed HLA antibodies before and after transplantectomy detected by the luminex single antigen assay.

Luminex donor‐specific crossmatches

HLA-DP antibodies before and after renal transplantation.

Clinical relevance of Luminex donor-specific crossmatches: data from 165 renal transplants