scispace - formally typeset
F

Fernando Díez

Researcher at Autonomous University of Madrid

Publications -  36
Citations -  745

Fernando Díez is an academic researcher from Autonomous University of Madrid. The author has contributed to research in topics: Recommender system & Collaborative filtering. The author has an hindex of 10, co-authored 34 publications receiving 668 citations. Previous affiliations of Fernando Díez include Nebrija University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Time-aware recommender systems: a comprehensive survey and analysis of existing evaluation protocols

TL;DR: A comprehensive survey and analysis of the state of the art on time-aware recommender systems (TARS), and proposes a methodological description framework aimed to make the evaluation process fair and reproducible.
Journal ArticleDOI

An empirical comparison of social, collaborative filtering, and hybrid recommenders

TL;DR: A coverage metric is proposed that uncovers and compensates for the incompleteness of performance evaluations based only on precision and is used together with precision metrics in an empirical comparison of several social, collaborative filtering, and hybrid recommenders.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Simple time-biased KNN-based recommendations

TL;DR: Results show that the usage of information near to the recommendation date alone can help improving recommendation results, with the additional benefit of reducing the information overload of the recommender engine.
Book ChapterDOI

Context-Aware Movie Recommendations: An Empirical Comparison of Pre-filtering, Post-filtering and Contextual Modeling Approaches

TL;DR: An empirical comparison of several pre-filtering, post- Filtering and contextual modeling approaches on the movie recommendation domain shows that there is neither a clear superior contextualization approach nor an always best contextual signal, and that achieved improvements depend on the recommendation algorithm used together with each contextualized approach.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Towards a more realistic evaluation: testing the ability to predict future tastes of matrix factorization-based recommenders

TL;DR: These experiments show that the addition of dynamic parameters do not necessarily yield to better results on these tasks when a more strict time-aware separation of train/test data is performed, and moreover, results may vary notably when different evaluation schemes are used.