F
Fernando Hoffmam
Researcher at Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos
Publications - 14
Citations - 66
Fernando Hoffmam is an academic researcher from Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos. The author has contributed to research in topics: Jurisdiction & Computer science. The author has an hindex of 2, co-authored 10 publications receiving 64 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
RESENHA: LEMOS, André; LÉVY, Pierre. O futuro da internet: em direção a uma ciberdemocracia planetária. São Paulo: Paulus, 2010.
Pela necessidade de uma teoria hermenêutico-integrativa da decisão jurídica
TL;DR: The authors criticar a discricionariedade interpretativa exercida no âmbito do Poder Judiciario, a partir da filosofia hermeneutica de Heidegger, e do pensamento pos-positivista de Dworkin.
Journal ArticleDOI
Por uma identidade constitucional “comum”
TL;DR: A transicao paradigmatica da teoria juridica ante a interdependencia da worldializacao aponta para o fim do monopolio estatal na producao jurídica, inventando, impondo e/ou constru-indo novos espacos normativos, a partir dos quais se permite apostar numa retomada do aspecto cosmopolita das tradicoes juridicas, ainda que nao seja esta a tendencia preponderante
Journal ArticleDOI
Direitos humanos na sociedade contemporânea: neoliberalismo e (pós)modernidade
TL;DR: Palavras-chave et al. as mentioned in this paper investigated the category of human rights related with (post)modern project and neoliberal rationalities, while the modern-Western paradigm persists, in this context, the contradictory role of Human Rights is linked with neoliberal political-economic ideology, while they persist.
Journal ArticleDOI
O controle de convencionalidade sob a perspectiva do direito processual constitucional
TL;DR: In this article, the authors demonstrate the relationship between the control of convention and the construction of a constitutional procedural law in relation to Brazil and Latin America inserted in the process of internationalization of human rights law, and the dialogue between jurisdictions also intensifies in a reality that now includes control of constitutionality and conventionality in the same procedural practice.