Machine Learning is the study of methods for programming computers to learn. Computers are applied to a wide range of tasks, and for most of these it is relatively easy for programmers to design and implement the necessary software. However, there are many tasks for which this is difficult or impossible. These can be divided into four general categories. First, there are problems for which there exist no human experts. For example, in modern automated manufacturing facilities, there is a need to predict machine failures before they occur by analyzing sensor readings. Because the machines are new, there are no human experts who can be interviewed by a programmer to provide the knowledge necessary to build a computer system. A machine learning system can study recorded data and subsequent machine failures and learn prediction rules. Second, there are problems where human experts exist, but where they are unable to explain their expertise. This is the case in many perceptual tasks, such as speech recognition, hand-writing recognition, and natural language understanding. Virtually all humans exhibit expert-level abilities on these tasks, but none of them can describe the detailed steps that they follow as they perform them. Fortunately, humans can provide machines with examples of the inputs and correct outputs for these tasks, so machine learning algorithms can learn to map the inputs to the outputs. Third, there are problems where phenomena are changing rapidly. In finance, for example, people would like to predict the future behavior of the stock market, of consumer purchases, or of exchange rates. These behaviors change frequently, so that even if a programmer could construct a good predictive computer program, it would need to be rewritten frequently. A learning program can relieve the programmer of this burden by constantly modifying and tuning a set of learned prediction rules. Fourth, there are applications that need to be customized for each computer user separately. Consider, for example, a program to filter unwanted electronic mail messages. Different users will need different filters. It is unreasonable to expect each user to program his or her own rules, and it is infeasible to provide every user with a software engineer to keep the rules up-to-date. A machine learning system can learn which mail messages the user rejects and maintain the filtering rules automatically. Machine learning addresses many of the same research questions as the fields of statistics, data mining, and psychology, but with differences of emphasis. Statistics focuses on understanding the phenomena that have generated the data, often with the goal of testing different hypotheses about those phenomena. Data mining seeks to find patterns in the data that are understandable by people. Psychological studies of human learning aspire to understand the mechanisms underlying the various learning behaviors exhibited by people (concept learning, skill acquisition, strategy change, etc.).

Machine learning

Probability Distributions.- Linear Models for Regression.- Linear Models for Classification.- Neural Networks.- Kernel Methods.- Sparse Kernel Machines.- Graphical Models.- Mixture Models and EM.- Approximate Inference.- Sampling Methods.- Continuous Latent Variables.- Sequential Data.- Combining Models.

Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning

National Institute of Standards and Technology における超伝導研究及び生活

This survey covers rollback-recovery techniques that do not require special language constructs. In the first part of the survey we classify rollback-recovery protocols into checkpoint-based and log-based.Checkpoint-based protocols rely solely on checkpointing for system state restoration. Checkpointing can be coordinated, uncoordinated, or communication-induced. Log-based protocols combine checkpointing with logging of nondeterministic events, encoded in tuples called determinants. Depending on how determinants are logged, log-based protocols can be pessimistic, optimistic, or causal. Throughout the survey, we highlight the research issues that are at the core of rollback-recovery and present the solutions that currently address them. We also compare the performance of different rollback-recovery protocols with respect to a series of desirable properties and discuss the issues that arise in the practical implementations of these protocols.

/pdf/a-survey-of-rollback-recovery-protocols-in-message-passing-bnrpate93a.pdf

A survey of rollback-recovery protocols in message-passing systems

Recognizing the mannerism ways to get this books computer organization and design the hardware software interface 4th fourth edition by patterson hennessy is additionally useful. You have remained in right site to begin getting this info. acquire the computer organization and design the hardware software interface 4th fourth edition by patterson hennessy join that we manage to pay for here and check out the link.

[서평]「Computer Organization and Design, The Hardware/Software Interface」

Modern advancements in computing architectures have been accompanied by new emergent paradigms to run Parallel Discrete Event Simulation models efficiently. Indeed, many new paradigms to effectively use the available underlying hardware have been proposed in the literature. Among these, the Share-Everything paradigm tackles massively-parallel shared-memory machines, in order to support speculative simulation by taking into account the limits and benefits related to this family of architectures. Previous results have shown how this paradigm outperforms traditional speculative strategies (such as data-separated Time Warp systems) whenever the granularity of executed events is small. In this paper, we show performance implications of this simulation-engine organization when the simulation models have a variable granularity. To this end, we have selected a traffic model, tailored for smart cities-oriented simulation. Our assessment illustrates the effects of the various tuning parameters related to the approach, opening to a higher understanding of this innovative paradigm.

Optimizing simulation on shared-memory platforms: the smart cities case

In modern data centers, energy usage represents one of the major factors affecting operational costs. Power capping is a technique that limits the power consumption of individual systems, which allows reducing the overall power demand at both cluster and data center levels. However, literature power capping approaches do not fit well the nature of important applications based on first-class multi-thread technology. For these applications performance may not grow linearly as a function of the thread-level parallelism because of the need for thread synchronization while accessing shared resources, such as shared data. In this paper we consider the problem of maximizing the application performance under a power cap by dynamically tuning the thread-level parallelism and the power state of the CPU-cores. Based on experimental observations, we design an adaptive technique that selects in linear time the optimal combination of thread-level parallelism and CPU-core power state for the specific workload profile of the multi-threaded application. We evaluate our proposal by relying on different benchmarks, configured to use different thread synchronization methods, and compare its effectiveness to different state-of-the-art techniques.

Adaptive Performance Optimization under Power Constraint in Multi-thread Applications with Diverse Scalability

High-performance computing on shared-memory/multi-core architectures could suffer from non-negligible performance bottlenecks due to coordination algorithms, which are nevertheless necessary to ensure the overall correctness and/or to support the execution of housekeeping operations, e.g. to recover computing resources (e.g., memory). Although more complex in design/development, a paradigm switch from classical coordination algorithms to wait-free ones could significantly boost the performance of HPC applications. 
In this paper we explore the relevance of this paradigm shift in shared-memory architectures, by focusing on the context of Parallel Discrete Event Simulation, where the Global Virtual Time (GVT) represents a fundamental coordination algorithm. It allows to compute the lower bound on the value of the logical time passed through by all the entities participating in a parallel/distributed computation. Hence it can be used to discriminate what events belong to the past history of the computation---thus being considered as committed---and allowing for memory recovery (e.g. of obsolete logs that were taken in order to support state recoverability) and non-revokable operations (e.g. I/O). 
We compare the reference (blocking) algorithm for shared memory, the one proposed by by Fujimoto and Hybinette \cite{Fuj97}, with an innovative wait-free implementation, emphasizing on what design choices must be made to enforce this paradigm shift, and what are the performance implications of removing critical sections in coordination algorithms.

On the Relevance of Wait-free Coordination Algorithms in Shared-Memory HPC: The Global Virtual Time Case.

The article “Fast Random Integer Generation in an Interval” by Lemire (2018) addressed the problem of reducing the cost of machine instructions needed for the random generation of integer values in a generic interval [0,s). The approach taken by the author is the one of exploiting the rejection method (Neumann 1951) to build an algorithm that almost eliminates the need for performing integer division operations—the algorithm still exploits divisions by powers of two, implemented in the form of cheap shift operations. In more details, the likelihood of not requiring an integer division in the proposed algorithm is 2L − s / 2L, where L denotes the number of bits used to represent integer values. The author also presents a comparative experimental study where the new algorithm, and its implementation for x86 processors, are compared with solutions offered by common software libraries for different programming languages.

Replicated Computational Results (RCR) Report for “Fast Random Integer Generation in an Interval”

OpenMP has become a reference standard for the design of parallel applications. This standard is evolving quickly, thus offering new opportunities to the application programmers. However, OpenMP runtime environments are often not fully aligned with the actual requirements imposed by the evolution of such a standard. Among the main lacks, we find: (a) a limited capability to effectively cope with task priorities, and (b) the inadequacy in guaranteeing core properties while processing tasks such as the so-called work-conservativeness—the ability of the OpenMP runtime environment to fully exploit the underlying multi-processor/multi-core machine through the avoidance of thread-blocking phases. In this article, we present the design of extensions to the GNU OpenMP (GOMP) implementation, integrated into gcc, which allow the effective management of tasks and their priorities. Our proposal is based on a user-space library—modularly combined with the one already offered by GOMP—and an external kernel-level Linux module—offering the opportunity to exploit raising hardware facilities for task/priority management. We also provide experimental results showing the effectiveness of our proposal, achieved by running either OpenMP common benchmarks or a new benchmark application (Hashtag-Text) that we explicitly devised to stress the runtime environment in relation to the above-mentioned task/priority management aspects.

Francesco Quaglia

Papers

Optimizing simulation on shared-memory platforms: the smart cities case

Adaptive Performance Optimization under Power Constraint in Multi-thread Applications with Diverse Scalability

On the Relevance of Wait-free Coordination Algorithms in Shared-Memory HPC: The Global Virtual Time Case.

Replicated Computational Results (RCR) Report for “Fast Random Integer Generation in an Interval”

Effective Runtime Management of Tasks and Priorities in GNU OpenMP Applications