scispace - formally typeset
F

Francis Teal

Researcher at University of Oxford

Publications -  150
Citations -  5232

Francis Teal is an academic researcher from University of Oxford. The author has contributed to research in topics: Productivity & Earnings. The author has an hindex of 35, co-authored 150 publications receiving 4910 citations. Previous affiliations of Francis Teal include Australian National University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Econometrics for grumblers: a new look at the literature on cross-country growth empirics

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present two general empirical frameworks for cross-country productivity analysis and demonstrate that they encompass the approaches in the growth empirics literature of the past two decades.
Posted Content

Productivity analysis in global manufacturing production

TL;DR: This paper analyzed manufacturing production across a large number of developing and developed economies and found that differences in production technology are of crucial importance for understanding cross-country differences in labour productivity and their underlying causes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Credit Constraints in Manufacturing Enterprises in Africa

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigate the question whether firms in the manufacturing sector in Africa are credit constrained, and they use direct evidence on whether firms had a demand of credit and whether their demand was satisfied in the formal credit market.
Journal ArticleDOI

Do African Manufacturing Firms Learn from Exporting

TL;DR: In this article, the authors use firm-level panel data for the manufacturing sector in four African countries to investigate whether exporting impacts on efficiency, and whether efficient firms self-select into the export market.
Journal ArticleDOI

Size and efficiency in African manufacturing firms: evidence from firm-level panel data

TL;DR: In this article, three dimensions of the performance of firms in Ghana's manufacturing sector are investigated: their technology and the importance of technical and allocative efficiency. And they show that the diversity of factor choices is not due to a nonhomothetic technology.